How does a preposition affect the part of speech it goes after? In the following sentences, I have two options: when the preposition "to" turns "limited" into an adjective, and when the preposition "by" turns "limited" into a verb. Can you explain to me, please, how that is possible? And my second question is, what is the semantic difference between using "to" and "by" in both cases? I only know that "to" is the maximum thing I can have, and "by" is the constraint, the thing that surrounds me. Thank you very much. Is this war limited to combat operations only, or is it limited to something else entirely? Is this war limited to combat operations only, or is it limited by something entirely else? And my last question is: Is there any grammatical difference between saying "something else entirely" or "something entirely else"? Thanks!

Hello everyone! Would you kindly assist me in identifying the parts of speech in this sentence? Thank you.  One way or another, it would be necessary to hand them over there.

Do I need an article before "Makhnovshchina" here? What we hear officials say is that the private army is the Makhnovshchina. P.S. The Makhnovshchina is the "Makhno movement."

It will not assist as it has [assisted] in the past. Would you please explain to me why I can leave "assisted" out?

The one they claim [is] an appropriate response is not an appropriate response. I would appreciate it if you could explain, please, why I need the verb "is" after "they claim." Thank you!

¿Quién alquila un apartamento en Dénia, España, o en general en España? Mis amigos - una pareja joven casada, refugiados de Ucrania, están buscando. Tienen un gata esterilizado de buenos modales. Solo hace caca en la caja de arena y lava el cuenco ella misma después de comer.

If you wrote a book and amended it later (clarified some information and added more), how would you indicate it? Is it correct to say, for example: Written: 2019 Clarified and supplemented: 2020 Maybe just "Amended: 2020"?

What options are more comprehensible, given the definition? 1. the total function of governance the partial function of governance or 2. the full cycle of governance the selective/partial cycle of governance Definition 1. The total function of governance, as an objective phenomenon, is a sequence of different actions in which the governance process is implemented throughout the fullness of the revealed opportunities and details. In other words, the total function includes all of the subject (process) control algorithms. The partial function of governance is part of a sequence of different actions in which the governance process is implemented throughout the fullness of the revealed opportunities and details. In other words, the partial function includes part of the subject (process) control algorithms. or 2. The full cycle of governance, as an objective phenomenon, is a sequence of different actions in which the governance process is implemented throughout the fullness of the revealed opportunities and details. In other words, the full cycle includes all of the subject (process) control algorithms. The selective/partial cycle of governance is part of a sequence of different actions in which the governance process is implemented throughout the fullness of the revealed opportunities and details. In other words, the selective/partial cycle includes part of the subject (process) control algorithms.

Is "forged" the most appropriate word to use here? A common culture that unites nations can either be uniform or forged in different proportions. Or, perhaps, "common" is not the best choice to describe a unified culture.