Some title Hello italki. I haven't been on that website for a bit long time, and never took it serisouly, to be honest. However, I know here some ppl who make corrections on short posts( or what do you call it, I forgot). Anyway, hopefully I will be able to write here some posts or even essays , and if it is possible also hope to see the corrections, too. Thanks, Vlad

Deutsch Praxis Heute morgen habe ich in 8 Uhr aufgewacht, nahm die Dusche und in 8.20 gegessen. Ich habe der Tee getrunken, das Sandwichdas gegessen. Ich habe 9 Stunde geschlafen. Und wie vielle Stunden sind genug für Ihnem der Schlaf?

Yet another essay The topic’s question : do you agree or disagree that progress is always good? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. There are many reasons why progress might be as good as bad. I suppose progress is the way which is developing our life. Therefore, it leads to the better living conditions, despite some harmful outcomes sometimes, this , however, does not prevent the good things which progress creates for people. In this essay, I will analyze the number of reasons on this statement. First off, the progress made a human from an ape. Since the creation of a first wheel, it led to huge developments in the life process such as, creation of a cart which helped to dig over the land and grow the first crops, in trade process the humanity could carry out it with relatively fair speed, etc. Hence, it's definitely could help to speed up the way the human live on. Otherwise, the humanity could stay in the Stone Ages for unidentified period. For a second reason, I would say that there is no doubt that some important aspects of our life , for example, a medical treatment could not be implemented without significant inventions in this area. For instance, longevity become much longer compare it to non-medical treatment era" when there wasn't any special devices such as, the basic instruments which the surgeons using on their daily basis. Consequently, the most important thing which every human has which is his or her own life could not exceed much without efforts of all engineers, doctors, biologists and anyhow science related people. For a third reason, I would point it out that the exploration of a future needs, for example, the new fuel for cars which is could be based on human-created materials rather than carbon material which is the humanity gain from bowels of the earth and also it widely used on the present time , this all could be totally impossible thing without any further research which leads to the progress of all human's inventions in overall. To conclude, it can be said that the progress is definitely an essential thing in the human's life, and it helps to discover the new opportunities which can help to upgrade the human's life. Thank you for your timely corrections.

The essay Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree? It is said that universities have to accept an equal number of male and female students in each subject which is taught at the university. In some cases this might be correct. In this essay I will analyze the pros and cons of this issue. The same opportunities for everyone. Considering the genders, it is notable that, despite the academic differences between males and females, both can achieve high scores in certain subjects. For instance, during exam periods everyone is trying to achieve good marks on the exam. Otherwise he or she would have to leave the university. Therefore, by creating the same opportunities for both genders, everyone can acquire benefits by using the selective approach which seeks what it wants. Society may embrace some form of gender-specific roles. Separating females and males into different classrooms helps to distinguish which subjects are more appropriate for each gender. For example, in the 19th century there was a strict separation between boys and girls in schools. The teachers used to believe that this created a stable atmosphere for studying, so that boys and girls can perform to the best of their ability. This system worked fine until the industrial revolution which changed people’s perceptions and which also influenced the educational system. However, contrary to these arguments, in general, males may perform better in exact sciences than girls. Indeed, if one takes a look at the statistics, then one can see that engineering departments of universities have a majority of young men while language or humanities departments are mostly filled with young women. A balance is reached as both genders show their preferences for their favorite subjects. Though this might not be completely correct, it is important, however, not to unbalance the system or job market at this crucial stage. In conclusion, on the one hand, I would like to point out that by accepting an equal number of male and female students could unbalance the system slightly. On the other hand, everyone should have the same opportunities to learn anything he or she likes.

the english insanity Why does the TOEFL writing requires to write essay just in 30 minutes only with just over 350 words,,,, it drives me 100% nuts. It's rather looks a sport competition than normal exam.

The TOEFL essay The essay topic: Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. There have a dispute that with human activity the Earth might to get worser or even be destroyed, but on the other hand the mankind's life become better after industrial revolution took the leadership and totally changed our life. In my view, one possible way, to not reduce the quality of life and in the same time not to refuse to all technologies we have, is attempt to minimize all harmful things which we are doing to the nature as much as we can. For a start, through generations the mankind's life met a lot changes, and each time it become better and better. For example, longevity increased significantly since the mid of 20 century, before that the human's life expectancy did not exceed 40 years for most of people. At first sight, human activity must be inevitable, otherwise life again can be shorted to what used to be in not too distant past. However, we must remember that natural resources are not endless and therefore we must think over what can replace them, or what the new technologies we must invent to prevent the harmful outcomes such as global warming, air pollution, electronics utilization and so on. One of the solutions to the problems with development of technologies could be some pressure on people to avoid using cars, disposable things such as plastic glasses, and do not change electronic devices frequently, possibly one times every 4 years, and so on. Therefore by saving the quality of life without much loss, the humanity can reach desired balance between industrialisation and live nature. It is necessary to produce some positive aspect functions when human are struggle to improve the survive abilities and from the experiences of history we also have make great effort to resolve this kinds of problems. For instance, most of people hope to limit the quantity of nuclear weapons and the protection of environment is accept by almost every one. Most of problems are controlled by ourselves and some of them have the hope to be resolved in years. The attempt to find the balance between the development and the protection of our Earth, make the advancement of human undeniable. To conclude, despite some problems in the process of the human development, this is without doubt that they could be solved

My TOEFL essay #2 The essay topic: Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. There have a dispute that by human activity the Earth might to get worse or even be destroyed, but on the other hand the mankind's life became better after industrial revolution took the leadership and totally changed our life. In my view, one possible way, to not reduce the quality of life and in the same time not to refuse to all technologies we have, is attempt to minimize all harmful to the nature things we made as much as we can. For a start, through generations the mankind's life met a lot changes, each time becoming better and better. For example, longevity increased significantly since the mid of 20 century, before that the human's life expectancy did not exceed 40 years for most of people. At first sight, human activity must be inevitable otherwise life again can be shorted to what used to be in not too distinct past. However, we must remember that natural resources are not endless and therefore we must think over what can replace them, or what the new technologies we must invent to prevent the harmful outcomes such as global warming, air pollution, electronics utilization and so on. One of the solutions to the problems with development of technologies could be some pressure on people to avoid using cars, disposable things such as plastic glasses, and do not change electronic devices frequently, possibly one times every 4 years, and so on. Therefore saving the quality of life without much loss, the humanity can keep it at the positive rate. It is necessary to produce some positive aspect functions when human are struggle to improve the survive abilities and from the experiences of history we also have make great effort to resolve this kinds of problems. For instance, most of people hope to limit the quantity of nuclear weapons and the protection of environment is accept by almost every one. Most of problems are controlled by ourselves and some of them have the hope to be resolved in years. The attempt to find the balance between the development and the protection of our Earth, make the advancement of human undeniable. To conclude, despite some problems in the process of the human development, this is without doubt that they could be solved as a whole we make the Earth a better place to live.

The TOEFL essay The essay topic: “When people succeed, it is because of hard work. Luck has nothing to do with success.” Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above? Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position. Working hard day by day can lead to the success but not always. One of the main keys to success is being on the sharp of recent trends. However, luck also may play not the last role in overall result. In my opinion, people should not mostly rely on luck, but they also need take into account is that there is no guarantee immediately to have expected result just because the hard work was done. For a start, it is proven by many famous people that besides working hard, the successful result is also highly depend from special occasion. For example, when Italian scientist L. Galvanie was observing frog's body, he occasionally found that when its foot touch two different connectors made of copper and lead, the frog begin shrinking. The scientist supposed that this was result of electricity in body of frog, however, later it was proven wrong and mistaken. In fact, when two different types of metal is connected then electrical transmission begin to work producing electricity. Although Galvanie wrongly made assumption about the nature of electricity, the experiment gave the first understanding what electric power is. For another reason why luck plays essential role, it could be said that to become famous, there also can be a requirement from luck to be involved in. Many sport starts, actors, politicians and so on, became famous and totally changed their lives, and merit for this lies to that fact that they were chosen by luck. Another words, the matter of success is determined by chances of each person differently. Also, it is presumptuous to judge another according to their apparent fortunate. No man can truly understand the suffering of his neighbor. A man who appears comfortably rich may have suffered elsewhere in his life - through the death of a loved one. Retired businessmen have often worked long hours in their youth. Surely, it must be wiser to respect achievement than to deny that anyone has achieved good in the world. To conclude, if somebody want to be successful then they need work hard and do not lose the hope every time when they meet some obstacles. However, success not always relies on hard working, it incorporates occasions, unexpected aftermath, and, of course, luck.