dvertising aiming at children should be banned With the development of entertainment industry nowadays, kids are overexposed to a blaze of advertisement, which is a terrible phenomenon since it brings up not a few passive influence. Therefore, I think it better to forbid advertisements aiming at children. Granted, advertisements have some benefits. Like public service announcements, appealing to people to protect the environment or resist drugs, help pupils cultivate good habits. Another advantage is that advertisements show the latest products, partly facilitating the potential purchaser. However, when it comes to children-target advertising, I think its disadvantages overweigh its advantages. With junk food advertisements peppered in media, children become more attracted to unhealthy food and consume more candy, ice-cream or French fries, leading to a higher risk of health problems like obesity. Except for health problems, advertisement may also distract pupils from school work, making the situation even worse. In addition, advertising targeting at children may probably cause excessive consumption if enterprises only care about selling products to make profit. Easily drawn to new, fancy things, children are especially vulnerable to commercial advertisements, which means once they see a new toy on TV, they just rush to ask their parents to buy it no matter whether they really need. This cause development of a bad consumption habit, of which juveniles are supposed to get rid. To sum up, advertisements contain both beneficial sides and adverse sides, but those aiming at children are more disadvantageous. Therefore, it is essential to forbid commercial adverting targeting on children to purify growing environment for the young.

Not agree to use animals as food and in other products like clothing and medicines From my personal perspective, I don’t think it essential to kill living creatures to meet human’s surviving demanding, as human society has been modernizing and there are other substitutes. The following article will exhibit my detailed discussion. Granted, people contingent a lot on animals, because they provide us not only the food but also raw materials for producing clothes and medicines. It is no exaggeration to say that human civilization was promoted after the ancient people learnt how to hunt and cook. However, it is intensely impersonal to take away creatures’ lives in order to satisfy ourselves, for the reason that they have feelings just like human beings, and their right of survival should be respected too. A lot of researches have already shown that animals possess particular feelings such as happiness and sadness, and they are able to feel pains as us do. Therefore, they deserve an appropriated treatment, preventing their rights for survival from being deprived. What’s more, since scientists have proved that vegetarians lead to a healthy life as well as average people who consume both meat and vegetables, the necessity of eating meat for balanced nutrition virtually decreases. In addition, with the development of material technology, clothes made from fiber materials are as warm as those made from animals’ skins, making killing animals for their skins become unreasonable and even illegal. To sum up, with the appearance of substitutes of animals products, killing creatures to meet human demanding is no longer reasonable and impersonal. Therefore, I back up the idea that it is not necessary to product food, clothing and medicines at the costs of animals’ lives.

Practice English Hello, I'm Julie, I'm preparing IELTS and I want to improve my oral English! Hope to make friends with you[emoji][emoji][emoji][emoji]