I'm confused about compound adjectives. Thank you!

Private Information vs Innovation Experiments and research which provide plenty of innovations or even a cure for chronic diseases require a considerable sum of information, including private one. Allowing this kind of data for research is an unquestionably tough decision, and the vivid question arises as to whether this private information is worth sharing. Those who disagree to give this type of data suggest that there are several means in addition to using private data to invent or come out with new innovative ideas. For instance, the researchers can hypothesise how the ordinary would react then use these presumptions to create a solution to their issue. Another reason why some individuals do not willingly share these data is that they desire to keep their privacy seeing that, in their point of view, their privacy is more crucial than those academic findings. On the other hand, cooperating with scientists or researchers by filling their questionnaires is not a problem for many people as they understand that the best and accurate method to carry out those experiments is utilising genuine data. As long as researchers who collect information have morality, sharing private information will not do any harm to those giving it. Nonetheless, not all of the researchers will adopt their data productively; thereby, they have to decide to supply information to organisations they can trust. On balance, admittedly, certain private data seem not worth sharing; still, these data can provide researchers with a way to succeed in their experiments. Thus, it can be argued that only to organisations we trust should we supply our confidential information.

Innovation I can't think of a verb( means come up with something new) here, it's on the tip of my tongue. He ...with a new innovation. I suppose it should be come out but it's not, help pls. Also, can we use confide organizations which means organizations that we can trust?

Innovation young and old(sorry the heading is wrong) Either youngsters or elderly citizens are able to supply plenty of productive action in their unique ways. Still, more and more countries, nowadays, have less elderly population as opposed to adolescents. Having more juveniles, countries are encountered with several proliferating problems. Teenage pregnancy is the most vivid drawback. As the number of adolescents climbs, this rate is inclined to rise as well. Another disadvantage is violent behaviour due to the increasing number of youngsters and the same limited number of education providers. The more congested students are, the harder for schooling authorities to manipulate them all. Thus, governments must provide schools with a greater fund as well as put more human resources to solve these situations. On the other hand, fewer elderly individuals mean fewer expenses on welfare since almost all of the unhealthy or the injured are elderly citizens who have chronic diseases. Furthermore, hardly do they help themselves resulting in more assistants is needed to aid these citizens. On the contrary, youngsters are the sort of population who is ready to help a country develop seeing that their health and mind are in a perfect condition. To sum up, admittedly, to monitor a considerable number of adolescents are a tricky job for governments. Nonetheless, they have a high potential of improving countries’ economy and society, regardless of what occupation they will be doing in the future. Thus, it can be argued that countries with more youngsters will gain more profit than those having elderly citizens as a majority.

every day vs everyday '..make sure to write everyday'

I suppose it should be every day but when writing like this will the meaning changes or it is just an error (I found this on text book, though).

Before And After The Renovation The table depicts the number of tourists travelling to Ashdown Museum before and after the renovation whereas these two pie charts illustrate the level of their satisfaction over this two periods. Before the renovation, tourists were not as they came to this museum. Those who dissatisfied made up 40% of total tourists as opposed to 10% in wretched ones. Nevertheless, nearly half of tourists were satisfied and very satisfied. This led to merely just over 70,000 tourists visiting Ashdown Museum. On the other hand, the number of tourists grew steeply by well over 20,000 people after the refurbishment. Similarly, three out of four visitors said they were happy and incredibly delightful. There was a 30% reduction in tourists who felt unhappy visiting this museum from 50% to only 20%. However, those who not respond to this questionnaires remained stable at 5% over these two periods. Overall, the number of tourists deciding to visit Ashdown Museum is on an upward trend after the renovation.

Economy or others Governments, nowadays, have to monitor various sectors, including economy, education or even healthcare. The considerable number of duties might lead them to emphasise one specific field which is economy as it indicates a country’s wealth. Nonetheless, other sectors can be as essential as economy. There are two distinct views about this governments’ focus. Contrives are attempting to be world’s greatest and most affluent country while the primary key is their economic progress. Those countries cannot deny that this sort of progress assists enhance images of a country. This issue also pinpoints as a factor which world-leading countries are; for example, according to the current news, majority of the citizens’ income of developed countries are much higher than the undeveloped ones. On the other hand, education and healthcare are the crucial factors to improve a country as well. Studies does not only improve youngsters to be incisive enough to cope with future problems in their lives but also help countries having more excellent population. Thus, progress in education is the significant method for making a country move forward. Another kind of crucial progress is health care which guarantees that several individuals will live longer and stay healthier. To have plenty of healthy citizens is beneficial for a government now that it could have powerful human resources. On balance, admittedly, having tons of job to do, governments may operate more conveniently if they emphasis on merely economic progress. Still, I am firmly convinced that they should equitably allocate their aim to economy, schooling and health care.

carbon dioxide emission This line graph illustrates the amount of carbon dioxide emission released by four countries per capita for forty consecutive years from 1967 to 2007. There was a marked reduction in Swedish’s emission of roughly 5 metric ton after reaching its peak at just over 10 metric ton in 1977. Similarly, the British’s carbon dioxide emission went down minorly from approximately 11 metric ton in 1967 to nearly 9 metric ton in 2007. On the other hand, the Portuguese people’s emission experienced a surge, which accounted for around 1 metric ton in 1967 then increased to 4.75 metric ton in the following 40 years. The emission of Italian people made up around 4 metric ton in 1967. After exceeding Swedish citizens’ emission in 1987, the Italian citizens’ emission climbed to well over 7 metric ton in 2007. Overall, the emission of British and Swedish people was on a downward trend whereas this of Italian and Portuguese citizens was inclined to rise.

Roads Or Railways Governments’ budget should be spent productively as most of it comes from every individual paying taxes. There are various types of expenditure authorities have to cope with, including transportation. This brings about the issue of whether this considerable sum of money ought to be spent on improving railways or roads.   Extending and fixing roads cost governments less than an expense of railways’ maintenance now that to construct new railways requires expertise and more staff to take care of the railway stations. Moreover, roads are able to access more places; for example, in the city centre congested with houses and buildings, building a new railway in this area to connect all spots would be more tricky than constructing a road.   On the other hand, roads are mostly used by those who own cars which are not affordable for everyone. Also, the natural environments would be harmed if all individuals have their cars whereas railways are for everyone, and the travelling expenses go directly to governments as opposed to car drivers whose money is for those car industries. Another benefit of railways is that travelling by railways will force passengers to meet new people. In other words, this is the opportunity those driving their own cars cannot have during traffic jams.   To sum up, admittedly, roads are more convenient and more accessible to many places. Still, railways are the mode of transport which is for everyone not only those who have cars. This means also help prevent people from loneliness which occurs in plenty of countries around the world.