money and grade To encourage children working hard at school, people have different methods. Some parents offer their children money for each high grade they get in school. From my perspective, even though according to it, children are likely to make much more effort, it still not a perfect way to do. To begin with, in my view, I don't think it is a good education for children to tell them everything can be bought by money. Many things, such as people's emotion or effort, which cannot be evaluated by money. For instance, there are a lot of scientists who advocate their whole life to research, they try their best to study something for belief and enthusiasm rather than money. In fact, I remember many scientists gain reward and money from the government because of their achievements, however, most of them spend that money on research again or donate it for people who need money. I believe this is the spirit that parents should teach their children from school-age. Furthermore, it cannot be denied that in the short term, money maybe can encourage children to get a good grade. What about a long time? If one day, children cannot receive money from their parents, would they still want to study? I'm afraid they would unsatisfied with their parents. As a result, they refuse to study unless they get money again. In this case, money becomes a damaging thing for children. Besides, the children who grew up under such a situation would take for granted that whatever they do, they must be paid. When they confront the fail one day, would they accept it? Would they get money even they enter a university? These are all unsolved problems. That's why I can't say it is a reasonable choice. In conclusion, I agree that money can be used to encourage children to do better as a reward, but should not let children take it as a purpose. What parents should do, is making their children form the correct attitude to money, study, value and their relationships. That is the most important thing for their future.

education Education is never an easy task no matter today or past. This also triggers a heated discussion over whether educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past or not. Some people believe that it is much more hard today because they spend so much time on other things, such as online games or social networking web sites, while others have an opposite attitude. From my perspective, I prefer the latter one. To begin with, it cannot deny that there are so many things distracting children's attention that they can't concentrate on their courses. However, in the other hand, these advanced technologies also provide a chance for children to see this world. For instance, as we know, children are always curious about this world and have so many strange questions, even parents are hard to interpret them. But now they don't need to look for the answers from their parents or books, what they should do is just to open their computer, to connect the Internet and they will know it. In fact, young people usually know much more than the elder people because they have more chances and enthusiam to accept and use these technolegies. Furthermore, I have to say that playing itself is a good way to learn. Take myself as an example. When I was high school, I was crazy about a game which a war game with a complex background. It was depend on the real history of world so that I had to remember much information about the certain courtries' history to pass it. A a result, I memoried events in history which I never study at school. Besides, I became interested in the history course and got great grade about it. This is not the only case, I also knew many poems at that time for I loved reading novels which my parents thought as meaningless books because they are not famous. I agree with the worrying that those things, like games or cell phones, are likely having a bad influences on children. In contrast, they also benefit children at certain aspects. In my views, what makes education becoming a difficult task is not games or computers, but children today form their own personality early and have their own opinions about everything. As a result, A good educaiton for them is no longer just forcing them to do something, but parents and teachers have to learn how to communicate with them and educate effiently.

work together or alone There is no doubt that teamwork is of vital importance for completing a mission so that teachers also usually assign projects on which students must work together. Speaking of teamwork, some people think it can help students to learn much more effectively, while others believe that it's better to worrk alone. From my perspective, I agree with the former one. To begin with, it's more effectively to work together because "team" itself is a request for everyone from the start. For instance, I think everyone has the similar experiences that we are tired of working on a project and always begin at the last minute. Even though eventually we can finish it on time but I am afraid it has poor quality because of lacking time. However, when people are in a team, that is not happen. Everyone would finish their own part carefully and timely to avoid making other people in team in trouble. Besides, no one want to be considered as a man with a drag. That's why when students are asked to work together, they can learn much more effectively. Furthermore, as we know, through working with others, we can broaden insights for different person has different opinions about same things, refering to their own experiences and education. In university, students who attend a optional class always have different majors.It takes for granted that they would think about the same question from diverse angles. So much knowledge and ideas one person never thought before can be learned from other students in team rather than searching them in the library or Internet. That could save much time for everyone. In addition, it is more likely to come up with a best idea about the assignment. It cannot be denied that work alone has its own advantage such as pratice how to complete a project independently even maybe confronting many problems, or learn to manage time to finish a work on tme. However, in my views, working together is a better choice if students want to lean much more effectively.

whether young people have influence on the society As the world changes so quickly, everyone is involved and associate with every aspect of this society, which leads to a heated discussion over whether young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society or not. From my perspective, I disagree with this statement and I never doubt the influences of young people today. To begin with, everyone has to admit that young people today have much more chances to take part in the social development. People have right to express their opinions freely, while it is a limitation that citizens talked about the goverment in the past. For instance, although young people are hard to impact the desicions about the society directly, however, they can show their attitudes to the goverment or share their opinions on the Intermet to raise heated discussion about it. In fact, different ideas about one desicion have to be considered before government inplement it. That's a way that young people today influence the important decisions that determine the future of society. Furthemore, what can influence the dicisions about society is not only the peoson who decides it, but also many other factors to make it true. For instance, the government plans to pass a policy about argiculture. As we know, argiculture is of vital importance for any countries. Imagine there is a young person whose major is engineer develops an advanced technology which could improve the output per arca dramatically, I assert that this invention can influence the policy about argiculture strongly because it will be benefit everyone in the future. That's why I believe attending the decisions about the future of society has many methods.In addition, everyone can do some efforts to influence it by using their own weapon, like knowledge. In conclusion, even though not everyone can make the decisions that determine the future of society by themselves, they can influence it through different methods. Besides, there is no doubt that young people's impacts cannot be ingored.

time arrangement of working As we know, it's common that people work 8 hours per day and five days a week. However, many people are engaged in the heated discussion over whether people should work only three days a week for long hours? From my perspective, I think it is more reasonable to work five days a week for shorter hours. To begin with, even though some people argue that working only three days per week can improve employee's effectiveness, in my views, it is hard to achieve it. For instance, I believe that everyone has the experience that feeling very exhausted and don't want to do anything after a long vacation. Our body has its own biological clock which not only make us awake in the morning and sleep in the night, but also pass a message when it don't want to work. After people rest for four days, I'm afraid our body has used to rest rather than preparing to work next day. It is unbenefitial for job and has to take much more energy to force themselves to finish their work. Furthermore, I have to point out that working three days a week for long hours is likely to damage people's healthy. To be more specific, because of this policy, people have to spend much time to finish the job in three days which should be completed in five days. Everyone can not be denied that it's bad for healthy if someone works over 12 hours one day. Moreover, nobody can gurantee that employees don't have any work in the rest days, even though the boss, because there are always changing in the business, especially when the cooperation's people work five days a week. Finally, in my opinion, the more enjoyable thing for a work is not work less days a week, but can own a regular timing. Before we go to work, we have time to eat breakfast or do some exercises. we concentrate on job to complete it in time rather than overtime. Then, we come back early, enjoy dinner and share a good time with our friends or family. That's what I think the enjoyable job. In conclusion, I hold the idea that it is more enjoyable to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours, rather than work only three days a week for long hours.

improve the quality of education How to improve the quality of education is not only an important problem for students, but also for university itself. To achieve it, some people hold the opinion that universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. As far as I am concerned, this is not the best method to improve the quality of education. To begin with, I have to admit that professors are worth getting much more salaries, because as we all know, how crucial and hard their work are. Furthermore, it can encourage them to do further reserach through raising their salaries. However, refer to improving the quality of educaiton,I doubt that this could be useful. What must be prioritized is that good professors are maybe not good teachers. When I was in university, I met some very talent professors who did very well in their field. I was happy to attend their class at first, but unfortunately, it was not as interesting as I expected. I cannot be attracted by the courses and hard to concentrate on it, even though the professors illustrate the problem clearly. That's why I think it is not useful to improve the quality of education by raising the salaries of professors. What some professors need are much more experiences about teaching, but not just more money. Another reason I have to mention is that education of university is not only refering to academic knowledge from professors, but also other abilities. Students can join some interest groups to learn what they want, other than requiring courses. Therefore, university can offer some fundings to support students. For instance, offering some oppotunities for those who want to learn foreign language to communicate with foriegner students, or support some groups activities. I believe that students can learn much from those activites.These vital parts of education should not be ignored. To sum up, the most proper method to improve the quality of education is to provide diverse ways to learn what students should learn and what they want to learn, rather than just spend more money on salaries for professors.

Should parents encourage teenage children to do part-time job? In general,part-time job is seen as a preparation to work in the future so that almost students have some experiences about it in university. However,for teenage children, is it a good way to encourage them to to take a part-time job? From my perspective,I don't think it is reasonable method to help teenage children prepare for adult life. What must be prioritized is the primiary tasks and reponsibilities of teenage children are studying, even though most of them are tired of learning and expect earning money quickly, just as I was. However, I believe that every adults would think occacionally that what they would be if they studied harder when they were in school.When I was in high school, I have a common grade,not bad but not so good. What I spent my time are reading and playing computer games. Eventually I went to a university which is good, but obviously, not so good. I don't regret it because I know I did what I wanted to do at that time. But sometimes, I would imagine that maybe I can do better now if I worked hard a bit when I was at the best age. That's way I asset that parents should encourage their teenage children to cherish this period to do more crucial things rather than to take a part-time job. Furthermore, I insist that work is not a rushy thing because everyone will do it of the whole life.In contrast, period of teenage is so short and precious. Hence, what parents should do is to make sure their children enjoying their best time, to learn, to make friends, to try everything they are interested in. I admit that learning to live independently and preparing for adult life are important for everyone, while period of teenage is not a good choice. All in all, do not afraid of doing something later.Not missing every minutes in the life is doing the right thing.

work quickly and mistake As we know, today's world is becoming more and more fast because of intense competition.That's why some people insist that it is important to work quickly even though it is more likely to make mistakes.However,for some other people,work slowly to make sure that everything is correct is much more crucial.From my perspect,I agree with the latter one. To begin with,I have to admit that there is always no enough time for us to do something slowly because time means success.Unfortunately,things often run on the contrary in reality.For instance,I had to submit some applications for scholarship at the beginning of semester.It just needed some personal information and a short essay.I didn't think it needed to take too much time on it and in fact I finished it soon.However,there were some problems I never thought when I submited it.One of the forms had not written correctly which must be followed certain requests.It is shame for me to miss it because I never read the requests carefully.Eventually,I took forms back,corrected them and checked them one more times.It spent me much time than I expected even though I finished it queckly initially.From my own experience,I believe that sometimes mistakes maybe lead to much time spending. Furthermore,if some minor mistakes has less influence to the result,it cannot be denied that it will bring a huge failure just because of a minor mistake people don't care.What is the most important thing is what's the goal of work.People always presue work quickly but forget that it cannot bring a good result,it means nothing.Hence,I believe that speed and accuracy should be considered as a whole because they influence each other.It is impossible to sacrifice one for another one. Obviously,work slowly doesn't mean neglecting the deadline.Finishing on time is the basic request for anyone.What I would like to say is that,I prefer to make sure everthing is correct even though I cannot finishi it quickly.

History as a required course Many universities set up some required courses which all students should take it no matter what their field of study is.One of required courses is history that many people doubt that it is nessasary to set up it as a required course rather than a select coursebecause history is seem to have no relation with any other courses,except itself.In my opinion,I agree with the statement that students should be required to take history courses even though their field of study is another one. Firstly,it cannot deny that history is the foundation of everything we have or we study.It is the key for human to be human beings today.Where we came from?What we experienced for thousands of years?How do we develop until today?The only one way to answer these questions is to learn our own history.To know ourselves,and then,it is possible to make progress. Secondly,when we take history courses,it is not only mean that we learn stories of history itself,but also learn wisdom of those people in the past.How they changed courtries,how they solve the problems that nobody can answer before.That is the most precious experiences which we can use it in our life and cannot learn it from where else.Besides,it is also important for us to learn those failure experiences in the history so that we will never make the same mistakes in the future. And also,history can be seen as a combination of many other fields of study,like economy,culture,art,music and so on.That is why it is very essencial for students,especially for those fresh university students who have not decided what they want to learn.They can get totally different ideas or thought when they take history courses. obviously through this course,students can understand what they want to study and make reasonable choice. Even though it may be a hard course for many students who has no interest in history,I believe that is a wise decision to require students to take it.