Seulement 5 phrases en francais! Corrigez s'il vous plait! J'ai entendu que vous voulez quitter le travail de conducteur. Pourquoi? Est-ce que vous pouvez expliquer la raison? Si vous n'etes pas satisfait avec le salaire, je peux l'augmenter. Qu'est-ce que vous dites a cela? Si ce n'est pas la problème, il serait bien si vous pouvez restez un peu plus long jusqu'a je trouve un nouveau conducteur.

Nur 5 Sätze! Bitte korrigieren Sie! Ich habe gehört dass Sie möchten von Ihrem Amt des Fahrers zurücktreten. Wieso? Könnten Sie bitte erstmal mir der Grund erzählen? Wenn Sie sind unzufrieden mit die Bezüge, werde ich aufbessern. Sie sind meiner wertvoller Fahrer. Bitte warten Sie mindestens ein Monat, bis dahin, werde ich einen neuen Fahrer gefunden haben.

Ist mein Deutsch korrekt? (3 Sätze) Guten Tag! Neulich habe ich Ihnen mündlich einen Vorschlag gemacht. Denn Sie interessieren sich sehr für den Vorschlag, ich möchte Ihnen bald einen Plan emailen. Bezüglich der Details, die Arbeiters des beziehender Posten und ich werden eine Praesentation machen. Ist Mittwoch der nächste Woche gut bei Ihnen? Herzlich, xxx(Name)

Help me with the TOEFL writing section! Below is an essay I wrote as an exercise for the TOEFL writing section. I'm not sure if my answer is well organized, for it is not multi-paragraphed. I would really appreciate it if you could correct the grammatical mistakes and tell me whether it's organized enough. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People learn things better from those at their own level-such as fellow students or co-workers-than from those at a higher level, such as teachers or supervisors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. I disagree to the statement that people learn things better from those at their own level than those at a higher level. I believe that both are necessary for improvements. It is true that with those that are at our own level, we can learn together and hence advance together. We may be able to discuss things that we both do not understand, and that may eventually lead to a good answer. We also usually have more opportunities to ask questions and discuss with each other than those that are at a higher level. However, learning from the latter can be extremely beneficial as well. For instance, I read philosophical books with a good friend of mine several times a week, and once in several months with professors and graduate students. Both of them are beneficial to me, because they both provide things that can’t be provided by the other. Those at a higher level have more experience and knowledge from years of studying, and therefore have the ability to provide information that is virtually impossible to be obtained from young students. This greatly advances and improves my knowledge and ways of thinking. I however feel more liberated to ask various questions to my friends. There are times when I ask a question that I thought was a dumb question at first but ask it any way, which turned out to be a key point of the passage, and therefore lead to an in-depth discussion. It is therefore difficult to say which is better; in my opinion, both of the factors are necessary in order to advance. Thank you!

Please help me with my TOEFL essay. Below is an essay I wrote for a task in TOEFl writing section. Please have a look and see if there are any grammatical mistakes. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? "People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do." Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. I agree with the statement, that people today spend too much time on personal enjoyment rather than doing things they should do. As the technology advanced, various types of entertainment have been invented, starting with the inventory of television. We now have millions of movies to choose from, hundreds of television programs to watch, many addicting games to play with, and the notoriously innumerable websites on the internet that take away our time so easily. At a time when these things did not exist, it should have been much easier to concentrate on important things that need to be done. For example, when I was a high school student, I did not have access to the internet on my cellphone. Now that I have it, I am constantly using my phone to do everything. It can be useful, and yet at the same time, I waste a lot of my time by looking at unrelated websites, and playing application games. The time I used for leisure reading and pondering is now used up entirely on the internet. Moreover, we get distracted by notifications. When e-mails and SMS messages are received, these useful programs instantly notify us, which makes us feel obliged to respond immediately to them. Even if we intend to reply to one message at first, we soon get allured into the exciting world of internet and end up wasting few hours. Unless one really tries hard to block everything out by switching off all the distracting stimulus such as phones, TVs and computers, one can be easily distracted and pulled into the world of enjoyment. Thank you!

2 TOEFL IBT writing test Below is an essay on dinosaurs that I had to write for TOEFL iBT writing section. Please have a look and see if there are any grammar mistakes. Task: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage. The lecture is about how many of the scientists believe that the points stated in the passage are not enough to prove that the dinosaurs are endotherms. First of all, regarding the point about polar regions, the professor states that polar regions were much warmer than today back then. The dinosaurs therefore could have lived there in the warm periods without being endotherms, and when the climate became cold, they could have migrated or hibernated. This clearly contradicts the passage which states that the fact that dinosaur fossils have been discovered in polar regions prove that dinosaurs were able to survive in very cold climates and therefore are endotherms. Next, the professor talks about how the explanation for dinosaurs having their legs under their body can be attributed to another reliable factor; their legs are positioned underneath their body, not because of allowing sustained physical activity as is stated in the passage, but because they grow to a very large size. The positioning of the legs may have evolved to support the great body weight of many dinosaurs. Finally, the professor explains that the growth rings, which is a thickening of the bone that indicates periods of slow growth alternating with periods of fast growth, are characteristics of non-endotherms, and the dinosaurs have this. It is true that they have Haversian canals, which allow the animals to grow rapidly, and it is a characteristic of endotherms, but there is also an evidence of not being endotherms in their bone structure. In conclusion, in contrast to the passage, it can be summarized from the lecture that the dinosaurs are not endotherms. Thank you for your cooperation!

TOEFL iBT essay - Could you please correct my grammatical mistakes? Below is an essay I wrote for a task in TOEFL iBT writing test. There was a time limit, so the quality may not be as well as it would be with lots of time, but I tried my best. I would very much appreciate it if you could correct my grammar mistakes. Task 1: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In twenty years there will fewer cars in use than there are today. I disagree with the statement; I think there will not be fewer cars in use than there are today in twenty years. Firstly, twenty years seem a little too unrealistic for such a revolutionary change. It is probably not enough for an evolution of vehicles. What’s more, even if a new vehicle was invented, it is highly assumable that it will not be affordable to the public at first. Usually, when new machineries are introduced, the target is mainly the rich people. For the cars to vanish, we would have to wait for a monopoly between multiple companies that sell the new vehicle, which will bring down the costs. Thus, twenty years will not be enough for the reduction of car use. A new type of fuel though may be invented instead of oil. The usage of beets and corns are already seen sporadically in some parts of the world. It is highly likely that more environmentally friendly resources may be sought in the next twenty years. Next, cars are necessary for many people. Bicycles and motorcycles are only for short distances and only allow one person to be transported, and airplanes and ships are only for extremely long distances and are also too expensive for everyday use. Some places do not have railways which will eliminate the choice of trains. Unless a new type of vehicle is invented, with the status quo, car use is unlikely to be reduced, even after twenty years. Overall, because cars are useful and affordable, and because twenty years seem too short for another vehicle to be invented, I disagree with the statement. Thank you!

Est-ce que vous pouvez corriger ce paragraphe,s'il vous plait?? Je dois parler de patrimoine mondial. Ci-dessous est ce que j'ai écris. Quand j’entends le mot « patrimoine mondial », je pense de Beatrix Potter ; elle est un écrivain et une illustratrice anglaise. Elle est connue d’avoir écrite et dessinée la célèbre histoire de Pierre Lapin, mais elle est aussi un National Trust bienfaiteur. Elle a visité le Lake District (c’est une région montagneuse située dans le Nord-Ouest de l’Angleterre) pour la premier fois en été en 1882 avec sa famille. Elle et son frère ont joué heureusement dans le bois et le champ. Comme ca elle a fait connaissance avec un pasteur qui lui a enseigné l’importance de conserver la campagne. Il l’a aidée de fonder le National Trust – une organisation pour protéger et conserver les terrains et les bâtiments. Avec son revenu de livres de Pierre Lapin, elle peut acheter les terrains pour le National Trust. Quand elle est morte, elle lui a transmis toutes les terres. Récemment, j’ai appris la nouvelle que le Lake District est nominée pour le patrimoine mondial, et qu’il va être soumis en 2016 à UNESCO. J’ai visité une fois cet endroit avec ma famille dans ma jeunesse. C’était un endroit vraiment spectaculaire, plein de belle nature, avec beaucoup de vaches et moutons partout. Je désire ardemment la décision par UNESCO qui va être prononcée en 2017.