Hello good teachers speaking English as their native language, How do you do. 1. What idle man can withtand the temptation of a woman to fascinate, and another man to eclipse.(original) 2. The idle man can withtand the temptation of a woman to fascinate, and he can withstand the temptation of another man to eclipse.(my guess to the original) Question: Which is grammatically correct? Do both have the same meaning? Mostly because I really don't understand why the word "What" is used in the original, (so) I imagine the number 2 which is my guess to the original. By grammar, ♦"what + subject( an idle man, oh…oh…I am perhaps sorry to guess here the author of original must have not neglect such simple article as a "an" before the "adjective idle") + predicate (can withstand) + object ( the temptation of a woman to fascinate) ♦ , IS a complex or complete noun phrase like ♦ what Tom ate yesterday), but then, the author suddenly writes "and another man to eclipse", apparently this is another noun phrase, which makes me totally be at a loss about the whole original structure as : a noun + and (another noun) like a apple and a table, it (the original)is two two nouns not complete sentence, how does it let me know what on earth it is means?!?! SO I HAVE TO exert my imagination so as to write number 2 , wanting to smooth the path to my anger at the author due to my poor English level, but wanting more to smooth the path to my boundless thanks to you because your explanation of the original by grammar definitely must be so logical and reasonable that it makes me suddenly correctly understand the original.

Choose the correct answer.

Hello Hindi learners, hope you all are doing well. Here is the question for you. How do you say " school" in Hindi?

Do you need help from an English tutor to improve your English speaking? Do you need help with basic conversation skills? Basic vocabulary? Do you need help with phrasal verbs or prepositions? Have you looked at my tutor profile or booked a lesson of mine yet? What are you waiting for?

Hello native English speakers. Could you do me a favour and help me for my queries about two sentences. 1a. The sea has eroded the cliff face over the years. ( This is a complete sentence) 1b. The sea's erosion of the cliff face over the years. ( This is a noun phrase) 1c. The erosion of the cliff face by the sea over the years. ( This is a noun phrase) Question: Are they all grammatically correct? Can these "expressions" be suggested the same meaning? 2a. Tom furtively ate three apples last week. ( This is a complete sentence) 2b. Tom's furtively eating three apples last week. ( This is a noun phrase) 2c. Tom's furtive eating of three apples last week. ( This is a noun phrase) 2d. For Tom to eat three apples furtively last week. (This is a noun phrase expressed by infinitive) Question: Are they all grammatically correct? Can these "expressions" be suggested the same meaning?

Which of the following is the Hindi word for "friend"? a) मित्र b) दुश्मन c) बच्चा d) परिवार

He is generous about/to/with/in failures. Which is the most natural?

"We still use many natural materials for our clothes like cotton, wool, silk and leather. We also use man-made textiles, like acrylic, polyester, and nylon." I wonder if it would be more appropriate to say fibers/materials instead of textiles？

Hi, I'm struggling to translate ' poner un parte " which in Spain consists of the following: If a student does something really bad at school like offending the teacher, behaving in a disruptive way etc, teachers write it down on a piece of paper that will be sent to the student's parents. If several are written, the student could be expelled for some days. It is more serious than things that require just telling them off in class.( Is 'tell off ' the correct verb here) ??? Could anyone tell me how to put it in English? Thank you very much indeed