Szukaj różnych nauczycieli angielski...
Posty
大家好, !!,請問,輾壓和碾壓有什麼區別? 該說現實的碾壓;還是現實的輾壓? 謝謝各位
8 października 2025
4
0
Te treści naruszają Wytyczne dot. Społeczności.8 marca 2022
9
0
大家好 我就想用我正在学习的材料 ,有没有人能帮我改正 ·今天轮到我做饭 不过下星期轮到他们做饭 ·现代,房子的价格翻了五倍,竞争特别难 ·毕业三年后,我遇见了他,她变得很大 ·他获得了法国国籍 ·我不得不考好那个考试 ·许多省组成中国 谢谢大家 !!!
19 stycznia 2022
17
0
人生如朝露 意所乐则为之 何暇计 人生如朝露 意所乐则为之 何暇计 Can someone help me to translate this ? I get the first one but the rest, I have no clue what it could mean Xiexie dajia
20 marca 2020
6
0
Why do you think people attend college or university? Saying that people attend college or university is a truth. Indeed, In the recent years, the number of students in higher education has increased to a certain point that it is now considered normal for a teenager to be a student. It wasn’t always the case and the truth is that, before the second world war, most of people wouldn’t attend college or university. Indeed, it’s very likely to meet an old couple of grandparents that didn’t go to class. At their time, one would go to class until the age of 14 and then work. The higher education’s students were rare and often had an upper-class background. Therefore, this assertion leads us to a significative question: why people would attend college or university. In light of nowadays, the main answer would be that students are now required to attend at least college and university. In many states such as France or the United-States, studying is now compulsory until the age of 16. Apart from that, there’s also an undeniable spurt in the number of university’s students. Ranging from hard sciences to plastic art, universities now provides a wide offer of classes and welcome each year an increasing number of students. First, it seems that going to college and university is now institutionalized as a classic life path. Indeed, the first way to get a job is now to have degree. Whereas before one could leverage his former experiences and skills to seduce an employer, there is now a protocol that must be enforced and it is especially true in the so-called “highly-skilled” jobs. Law firms would require a lawyer a law degree, preferably from a well-know university, and then will ask him to attend an interview. Meanwhile, the baker might as well demand a bakery certificate but he will be more likely to hire someone that proven as trustworthy and skilled, even though he learnt bakery following in dad’s footstep. But the job reason cannot be the only one why people would attend college or university. There must be an higher one, a one that deals with the appetite of human being of learning. Indeed, if jobs were the only reason why one would go to class, there would be more dropouts than ever. The fact is that even the most annoying and the least earnest students receive something from education. They’re learning and it gives them a foretaste of how the world used to be, how it is now, and how it will be. Hi! Can someone help me to correct my English dissertation please, Thanks!!
28 lutego 2020
4
0
Random texte: Bryan's kitchen's on fire One day, Bryan was caught in a blaze. In the midst of the plumes of smoke, he was trying to find a way out. His utter fear was that the fire flared up, the consecutive outage had indeed darkened the room where he stood and he couldn’t find the source of the danger. Fortunately, he had his phone and with the lamp app, he managed to find a little hole leading to an exit. He knew that this hole would lead him to an access in the main street of N.Y. In a leap, he hoped in and found himself in a dismal narrow corridor. He crept in. Meanwhile, the flat was completely charred and the little teddy bear fell apart from the flames. He didn’t utter a word. He was frightened, sweaty and tremendously tired. His back ached and he couldn’t bear anymore the narrowness of the path he found. After five minutes, the path throwed him into a large room. He immediately recognized Maria’s apartment, with all these old Russian appliances, these heart-shaped brooms and those grey curtains. Thanks guys ::! I'm trying to use new vocabulary so i'm a bit doubtful on how to use it, could you please help me to know where are the eventual mistakes? Thank you::
13 lutego 2020
3
0
English grammar problems :) Hey everyone, I have two questions that I cannot solve: First, I don't understand the sentence: The secretary had the messenger deliver the envelope as soon as possible. Does it mean that the secretary put the messenger in charge of delivering the envelope as soon as possible? In that case, the structure: (Have someone + Verb) would mean make someone do something? Or does it have a completely different meaning? Also, I have this sentence: When the directors.... a profit, they'll be satisfied. I filled that up like that : When the directors will see a profit, they'll be satisfied But apparently, one cannot use future when there is also the future in the subordinate. Therefore, the right answer would be : When the directors see a profit, they'll be satisfied. I can, then, never say : When this will occur, He will be delighted or something else...?? One should always write : When this occur, he will be delighted ? I really cannot? Thanks for everything!!
15 grudnia 2019
5
0
Grammar problems that I cannot solve Hey everyone, I’m sorry but I have some questions which I’m not able to find answers to: I have a sentence: She misses the day when se earned a living by selling ice-cream. Can I say: She misses the time when she earned a living selling ice-cream. Can I remove the by; and replace the days by the time? Is it the same meaning, is there significant differences? Also, I have two other different sentences: -My boss wishes he had not promised her that post, which she doesn’t want anymore. -I wish you did not have so many problems. Why can’t I say: I wish you had not so many problems. (As in the first sentence) or My boss wish he didn’t promise her that post, which she doesn’t want anymore. (as in the second sentence) It feels like the difference between hadn’t and didn’t is a schoolchild knowledge, but It looks like I’ve forgotten it. Finally, another sentence: I wish you had brought me the book you told me about yesterday. Why isn’t it I wish you had bring me the book you told me about yesterday. My lessons say that when one wants to express regrets, we use wish + preterit, I can’t understand why would anyone write brought, it sounds better indeed but I cannot know why. Thanks a lot!
16 września 2019
2
0
用除了,以外 大家好 我有一些问题跟这句句子: 除了...以外,也/还/都 If I say : 除了春天以外,我也喜欢夏天. It means I like spring and summer right? But, what about 这个句子:除了我的老师以外,其他人都是外国人. It means that everyone is also foreigner except my teacher? And if I say : 除了我的老师以外, 其他人也是中国人. In this case, everyone is Chinese right? The meaning of the sentence will depend on the use of 还,也,都,?If I had written : 除了我的老师以外, 其他人也是中国人, would everyone be also Chinese? 谢谢!
29 lipca 2019
6
0
Government facing a backlash Lisa really liked her shoes. She used to think that these were bespoke. In fact, they were not, these were simply the shoes that everyone wears. As she dressed up, she looked out of the window and saw a huge crowd. All the inhabitants of the city were gathered protesting against the government. The demonstrators were waving signs covered with “No more nepotism, no more corruption “and were singing a well-known traditional song “So long evil spirit”. Of course, she was frightened. After all, she was part of that government, was she a target? She reminded all the measures and the policies that she and her son had tried to uphold; but nothing had worked. They were facing a backlash, she knew it. As soon as she will walk by the Home office, everyone would scold her; of course, they knew exactly what to do… Now, she has to go there and play her last card: devolving power. She stood up, took a deep breath and reached the door. Hardliners deputies were already urging for “population sift-out” but as soon as she walked in, everyone got quiet. She outlined her new policy : “ a new time has come, everyone as, sooner or later, to comply with the rules, these are made for that, what five years ago seemed to be insuperable is now possible: I, then, state that there will be no more Home Office and that this institution will be replaced by forty smaller but similar houses. I would love is someone could correct me and tell me like more native way of saying something ;) Thanks you !!
3 lipca 2019
2
0
Pokaż więcej