do cities tru destroy historic buildings or preserve them? Some people believe that cities must destroy old buildings. On the other hand, others take the view that cities should preserve historic buildings. There are many advantages and disadvantages in both views. But , in my opinion, we should try to preserve old buildings beacause they make us aware about our cultures. Furthermore, tourism industry will inmprovr the economic the cities. No wonder, ancient buildings are great source of knowledge and information about our cultures. They can make us feel connected to our ancestores. Undoubtedly, We can learn a wide variety of information about their style of lives in the past. In other words, historical buildings teach us customs of ancient period and have remarkable influence on our understanding about the past. For instance, ancient pyramid in Egypt can serve as a bridge between us and people who lived in the past. Carving on the wall of caves teach us how people was hunting. moreover, old buildings can have remarkable influence on the economic of the cities. These buildings, attract a large number of touris. They will spend money to visit the recreation centers, museums, and they spectacular places. As a result cities have to develop their infrastructure like subways or public transportation. More hotels will be built and more tourists will be attracted. consequently, this chain, will have significant influence on the economic of the cities. In summary, taking into account all these factors, we reach the conclusion that historic building not only can be informative and give us plentiful of information about our cultures, but also have great influence on the economic of the area. If you are not agree with my view, I strongly recommend your thinking about the topic again and again.