Найди преподавателей языка: английский
Danyel
Thе cakе would havе burnt іf І hadn't gonе... Thе cakе would havе burnt іf І hadn't gonе to thе kіtchеn. & Thе cakе would havе been burnt іf І hadn't gonе to thе kіtchеn. What is the difference?
29 апр. 2017 г., 9:35
Ответы · 2
1
As Micahel helpfully explains, "the cake would have burnt" is referring to the action of the cake burning, whereas "the cake would have been burnt" refers to the final result - a burnt cake! --- Want to learn English the SMART (Stretch, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, Timely) way with me? Go to my teacher profile and book your $1 trial lesson now! http://bit.ly/paulblakemanitalkiteacher
29 апреля 2017 г.
1
to be burnt - burnt is a past participle which is being used as an adjective to describe the state of the cake. to burn - verb to describe the activity in this case within itself (the cake); there is no direct object There is no significant difference in meaning in this case.
29 апреля 2017 г.
Все еще не нашли ответы?
Напишите свои вопросы, и пусть вам помогут носители языка!