Найди преподавателей языка: английский
Danyel
Thе cakе would havе burnt іf І hadn't gonе...
Thе cakе would havе burnt іf І hadn't gonе to thе kіtchеn.
&
Thе cakе would havе been burnt іf І hadn't gonе to thе kіtchеn.
What is the difference?
29 апр. 2017 г., 9:35
Ответы · 2
1
As Micahel helpfully explains, "the cake would have burnt" is referring to the action of the cake burning, whereas "the cake would have been burnt" refers to the final result - a burnt cake!
---
Want to learn English the SMART (Stretch, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, Timely) way with me? Go to my teacher profile and book your $1 trial lesson now!
http://bit.ly/paulblakemanitalkiteacher
29 апреля 2017 г.
1
to be burnt - burnt is a past participle which is being used as an adjective to describe the state of the cake.
to burn - verb to describe the activity in this case within itself (the cake); there is no direct object
There is no significant difference in meaning in this case.
29 апреля 2017 г.
Все еще не нашли ответы?
Напишите свои вопросы, и пусть вам помогут носители языка!
Danyel
Языковые навыки
белорусский, английский, французский, польский, русский, украинский
Изучаемый язык
английский, польский
Статьи, которые тебе могут быть интересны

Speak More Fluently with This Simple Technique
14 нравится · 2 Комментариев

How to Read and Understand a Business Contract in English
16 нравится · 3 Комментариев

6 Ways italki Can Help You Succeed in Your School Language Classes
12 нравится · 7 Комментариев
Еще статьи