True to gorilla’s unaggressive nature, the huge animal meant me no real harm. 1. Does this stence omit something？ 2. If it omits, then what is it? And why? 3. Does it need a conjuction between the two parts? At the first sight, I am very confused about the structure of this sentence. Now I understand the last part, but I still have problem with the first part and I think as my friend told me the first part should be "it is true……", we need to put a conjuction between these two parts,right?It is taken from here: I’m not sure _____ is more frightened, me or the female gorilla that suddenly appear out of nowhere. I’m walking on a path in the forest in the Central African Republic. Unexpectedly, I’m face-to-face with the gorilla, who begins screaming at ____ top of her lungs. That makes her baby scream, and then a 400-pound male appears. He creams the ____(loud) of all. The noise shakes the trees as the male beats his chest and charges toward me. I quickly lower myself, ducking my head to avoid _____(look) directly into his eyes so he doesn’t feel _____(challenge). My name is Mireya Mayor. I’m a _____(science) who studies animals such as apes and monkeys. I was searching _____ these three western lowland gorillas I’d been observing. No one had seen them for hours, and my colleagues and I were worried. When the gorilla and I frightened each other, I was just glad t find ____(they) alive. True to gorilla’s unaggressive nature, the huge animal ____(mean) me no real harm. He was just saying: “I’m king of this forest, and here is your reminder!” Once his message was delivered, he allowed me ____(stay) and watch.Sorry, it is "True to gorillas' unaggressive nature, the huge animal meant me no real harm."