Conjugation of HABER translation, please help!
Is this corrected translated:

INDICATIVO:
(Pretérito perfecto)
He amado = I have loved

(Pretérito pluscuamperfecto)
Había amado = I had loved

(Pretérito anterior)
Hube amado = I have loved

(Futuro perfecto)
Habré amado = I will/shall have loved

(Condicional compuesto)
Habría amado = I would/should have loved

SUBJUNTIVO:
(Pretérito perfecto)
Haya amado = I have loved

(Pretérito imperfecto)
Hubiera/Hubiese amado = I would/should have loved

(Futuro perfecto)
Hubiere amado = I would/should have been loved

Is this correct? I just don't get what the different tenses mean, cuz in books it says differently! .

Question

Conjugation of HABER translation, please help!
Is this corrected translated:

INDICATIVO:
(Pretérito perfecto)
He amado = I have loved

(Pretérito pluscuamperfecto)
Había amado = I had loved

(Pretérito anterior)
Hube amado = I have loved

(Futuro perfecto)
Habré amado = I will/shall have loved

(Condicional compuesto)
Habría amado = I would/should have loved

SUBJUNTIVO:
(Pretérito perfecto)
Haya amado = I have loved

(Pretérito imperfecto)
Hubiera/Hubiese amado = I would/should have loved

(Futuro perfecto)
Hubiere amado = I would/should have been loved

Is this correct? I just don't get what the different tenses mean, cuz in books it says differently! >.

Answer

Well, pretérito perfecto is frecuently used in sentences like "hoy he visto un accidente", "¿has visto tal película?"

There's no diferences between 'hubiera/hubiese', 'amara/amase', 'tuviera/tuviese'... The '-ase/-ese' form comes from the latin '-(v)isse'. Example: amavissem, (I would have loved). In Spain the first form is more used than Hispanic America, where is considerated more formal.

Answer

It's perfect.
Don't worry about the use.
preterito perfecto normally it isn't used , it only appears in old spanish texts.
between hubiera o hubiese amado there is no diference the both are the same we use indictinctly