Whether reading books can developed imagination better or watching TV? When it comes to the compare of reading books and watching TV, which one promoted imagination more? Different people have different views. Some people choose the former one, while others lean to the later. From my perspective, both these two sides have their own rationality from some aspects. Undoubtedly, people who often read for pleasure developed their imagination largely. The most apparent example is those people who read novels frequently usually appeared more imaginative than others who read less and their learning to other people’s psychological change are more flourishing. The reason of this situation may rise form the words depicted of books commonly leave larger imagination volume for its readers that they can imagine any images according to his or her comprehension. Moreover, the psychological details of books described definitely more concrete than images or video expression, which also allow the reader to fly their imagination more effectively. However, this alone can not deny the fact that people prefer to watch TV lack the opportunities to develop their imagination because the story played on TV series or other programs often create many suspense occasions in order to attract the audience concern them constantly. In addition, the fancy pictures raised on the TV left more retrospect to the audience which may allow them to develop the story by their imagination. So it hardly to say people who prefer to watch TV are lack of imagination ability compared with those liked reading. In conclusion, both TV and books have their own advantages to foster the imagination capacity of different people. The only difference is which means do you like more. Some people may feel read books are boring and tired, while others may criticize TV are too saltless. So if you force those to choose their disgusted one. It’s irrationality to say this method is beneficial to his or her imagination development, which means the best one is the most suitable one.