Toefl essay 3.0 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: in twenty years there will be fewer cars on the road than there are today. I disagree with the statement above. The rate of automobile ownership increases every year. In fact, nowadays I see so many more cars on the road than I had saw before. I feel this way for two main reasons that I will explore in the following essay. To begin with, in logic, as the world's population continues to grow, as the number of cars on the road will be increase. Every year I see more and more people and cars on my city. I remember that when I was a child, there were few cars where I live. Almost had no traffic. The city was very calm, in part, because of the few habitants in there. However, nowadays there are so many cars on the road that sometimes I spend hours in the transit. There are some places that the easiest and quickly way to go to is by car. On the other hand, the public transportation is getting better. Firstly, because of the government’s investment. Secondly, some international protocols urge for a better ambient protection, including alternatives for transportations like cars. The cars pollutes very much the air with CO². Public transportations usually pollutes the air too, but in a less harmful way. Because the moving of, for example, fifty people on a bus will emit very less CO2 than the transportation of fifty people on fifty cars. However, even with a better public transportation, with the increasing of population, I think that in twenty years there will have more cars on the street there are today. I can say that the improvement of the bus line on my city was not enough to decrease the number of cars on the road. I think that maybe a good subway could stop the growth of car sells, but not reduce it. In conclusion, I think that there will not be more cars on the road the there today in the future. Firstly, because with the population grow will be have, in logic, more on the road. Secondly, because the only thing that could reduce the number of car is a better public transportation. However, I think that a better public transportation could, at most, only to freeze the number of cars, but not to diminish it.

Essay for the toefl 2.0 Some people think governments should spend as much money as possible exploring outer space (for example, traveling to the Moon and to other planets). Other people disagree and think governments should spend this money for our basic needs on Earth. Which of these two opinions do you agree with? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. I live in a very poor street where I see children dying for hunger every day; I am a witness of the lack of basic needs for humanity. I agree with the second opinion, I feel this way because of my life experience, which I will exposed better in the following essay. I work as volunteer on the Emater Village, which is a social project intended to help the families that live in a garbage dump. Some mothers have to support alone a family with 8 children earning only 300 reais in each month, witch is equivalent a less than half of a minimum salary. The school is deficient; most families have big difficulty for being attended by a public hospital when it is needed. Sometimes, I keep wondering with myself why the government spent so much money in exploring outer space, while have so much poverty in the world. On the other hand, I recognize the importance of knowledge. When I was a child, I wished to be an astronaut for a while. The universe was a dream to me. However, when I grow up and had started to see the disrespected human rights of the world, I changed my mind. Nowadays I fight for what I believe it is a better world: a world where all the human beings live with quality. I believe that first the government should to guarantee a good life for everyone: house, food, education, health and all the other human rights written in the constitution. Exploring outer space is interesting and wonderful, but do not bring much direct advantage for the humanity. Actuality, the only benefit that exploring outer space brings is knowledge, at least nowadays. In my opinion, the basic needs on Earth are ultimately necessary. Many lives depends directly of the attendance of basic needs. While exploring the outer space is interesting just for take more knowledge about the universe. Therefore, I think that governments should spend as much money as possible for our basics needs on Earth.

How do movies or television influence people’s behavior? Use reasons and specific examples [...]. Movies have been influencing me since I was a little child; I think that they have turned me a dreamer person, for example. I prefer to talk about the influence of movies, because I watch very little TV, what is a characteristic of my generation. In my opinion, movies usually transmits some values of freedom. As well, they often tell stories about the importance of to seize the life. Since sexual revolution, movies have been showing stories of free love and criticising some conservatism of society. The history of crazy love had influenced many people to love without care for marriage, for instance. The film Titanic shows the history of an aristocratic girl that falls in love for a poor boy. The woman had a rich husband-to be, but did not love him. She betrayed him to live an adventurous love history with a poor man, against all the society’s conventions. I think that some taboos do not exists anymore in partly because of the movies’ influence; because of them, I think that pre-marital sex is so common nowadays. For me, movies helps to create a beautiful generation of brave dreamers, as well transmits that everyone should seize the life. Many films show the history of apparent impossible dreams coming true, what have been inspiring millions of people. For example, the movie Dead poets society inspired me a lot to fight to achieve a good career as an actress. In the cited movie there is a great student that wants to be an actor. He even had a wonderful performance in a school play. But his parents do not want him to be an actor, what have terrible consequences. I had identified myself a lot with this character: I always have been a good student, but my dream always was to be an actress, even that my parents does not want it. Because of the movies, I decided to risk everything to make my dreams come true. In conclusion, I believe that movies influence the people behaviour to break social conventions, to try to life in more fulfilment way and to be braver in the fight of make dreams come true.

Essay help for the toefl in this saturday Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer In the educational system of my country, the classes generally are with lectures with few discussions between the professor and students. I all my life, I only had three classes with open discussions and almost no lectures. In my opinion, I prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions because I feel that I learned more in this kind of classes. I will explore mw experiences with both classes’ styles in the following essay. The classes with open discussions were the exception in my student life. They only happened because my teachers had the desire of making a different dynamic in classroom. Two of them were about the discussion in particular themes of a book. One of these books was a law case about some men that in an agreement decided to make game in which who lost in this game would be eaten by the others. They were in a terrible situation if hunger, almost dying and we discuss about the justice and moral of this case. I remember that the discussion was very productive. However, in the others classes of this type, I do not think that I had learned much, because most of the topics were discussed by the common sense point of view. I did not felt any increase of knowledge in these classes. I believe that this kind of class is better to discuss about interesting topics and point of views of abstract terms, like justice and moral. Furthemore, most of my classes with lectures and almost no discussions were more useful for me. The teachers have a bigger knowledge than the students do, so they talks about the subjectives with much more information. Usually some discussions are important as a support for the lectures. However, in fact, I think that I learn better with the lecture in most of the time, because they are more objective and brings more knowledge to me. In conclusion, I prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions, because I have learned more in this way and I am most accustomed with this system. I think that classes with open discussions only are interesting if were about some specifics topics, like discussions about what is justice.