寻找适合你的 英语 教师…
Ryota
Is the clause “without whose … life” an adjectival phrase that modify “other animals”?
“Are other animals disappearing that at first do not seem to be essential yet without whose activity we could not conceive life?”
2024年3月27日 06:30
回答 · 3
2
This sentence could be written as "Are other animals that do not seem essential and that without whose activity we could not conceive life disappearing?" but this violates English end-weight principles. If you want more information, do a net search for "Definition and Examples of End Weight in Grammar." The article on the thoughtco dot com web site is meant for a general audience.
2024年3月27日
受邀老师
Salaam Ryota!
Yes, "whose" refers to the "animals".
2024年3月27日
It is a badly placed adjective phrase. To make your sentences clear, place adjectival phrases next to the words they are intended to modify:
“Are animals, without whose activity life could not be conceived, disappearing?”
2024年3月27日
还未找到你的答案吗?
把你的问题写下来,让母语人士来帮助你!


