Exercice
Pratique quotidienne
(Formal Letter) Dear Editor, I am writing regarding the letter you have recently published in relation to the council's proposal about spending a large part of public allowance on building an art gallery. I think the opinions expressed in it are harsh and biased. In spite of having some understable points, the writer gets out on line expressing them. However, not the writer’s tone was what angered me most, but the assumptions they make about our town. To begin with, I would like to highlight the fact that our town already has the goods and services needed by the community, provided by the council, and these fully satisfy the demand. Consequently, there are not “far more important things,” maybe some things could be more important depending on everyone. Besides, should the administration not invert all the allowance from the government, it would lose it. Needless to say, I deeply disagree with the accusation of losing sight of our priorities, as if they had bothered to look around in the first place. Nonetheless, the last straw was assuming people here were not interested in art and sending the ones who do to the big cities as if they had made a survey. Also, they ignore the possibility of making our town attractive to cultivate visitors and artists with the benefits this implies. I hope you take my opinion into account and your newspaper publishes a more informative and objective article on this topic. Yours faithfully,
28 avr. 2024 18:03
0
0
Afficher plus