Busca entre varios profesores de Inglés...
Preguntas
Hello native English speakers. However, he said no one should be forced to take in second hand smoke --- which was why the group advocated segregated areas for those who did not what to be exposed. (original) Question: Is this sentence grammatically correct? Depending on my intuition of the prepositional phrase “for those who did not what to be exposed” , which is on the last part of the original, and , by the way, on my intuition of grammar, I have been puzzling about why the “ what to be exposed” being after the “did not” because, by grammar,there should be a bare infinitive after the “did not ” , why on earth should there be a noun phrase “what to be exposed” after it? I want to boldly guess about the nub so that the original might be grammatical : for those who did not what to be exposed = for those who did not be forced (or did not want ) to take in second hand smoke , which is what to be exposed. and only in this way can I slightly have a good feeling to understand the original I am very eager to get help ---liberating me from my predicament on understanding such a predicamental noun phrase.
28 de diciembre de 2025
3
0
Mostrar más
Hacer una pregunta
Pregunta cualquier duda que tengas sobre el idioma.

No pierdas la oportunidad de aprender un idioma desde la comodidad de tu casa. ¡Explora nuestra selección de profesores de idiomas con experiencia e inscríbete ya en tu primera clase!