Let's write an IELTS essay #6 In some countries, marriages are arranged by the parents but in other cases, people choose their own marriage partner. Discuss both systems. Families have long been regarded as the building blocks of a society. In that connection, marriage is what makes those building blocks stay together. This is the reason why the society, especially the elderly perceive marriage as a substantial matter. In fact, in some cultures, parents involve in the process of choosing marriage partners for their children. While, some commentators argue that people should choose their life partners without any parental intervention, others claim that parents are much wiser than their children, and they are more aware of the consequences of an unhappy marriage. In this essay, I will argue that people should be able to choose their marriage partners, nevertheless it could be wise taking advice of the elderly into consideration. To begin with, people are generally more satisfied with their marriage when they choose their own marriage partner. This is largely because of the human psychology, a person generally undervalues the mistakes, and overvalues the right choices he makes. For example, I always blame my parents for the wrong choices they make for me, however I never appreciate the right choices they make for me. In contrast, I am always satisfied with the consequences of my own choices. Therefore, the society should allow people to choose their own marriage partner. On the other hand, it is axiomatic that people should consult some other people when taking a major decision, results of which are able to change their life. Essentially, marriage is one of those decisions, and consulting the elderly on that matter may help people eliminate irreversible mistakes. For instance, getting married to a person with criminal records, or a person who regularly gets divorced to take advantage of his ex-spouse might result in traumatic results in a person’s life. When viewed in this light, it becomes evident that parental advice should be taken into consideration choosing a life partner. To conclude, free will is essential choosing a marriage partner for the aforementioned reasons. Nevertheless, making use of the elderly’s, most importantly parents’ opinions could be a wise idea as people are to prone to making mistakes when it comes to life choices.

Let's write an IELTS essay #4 In recent decades, technology has begun to eliminate the need for several professions. Nevertheless, the question whether it is possible to utilize technology to translate text and speech to another language as accurate as human translators has recently sparked some heated controversy. While some linguists argue that artificial intelligence (AI) is not capable of learning a language like humans do, some AI experts claim that AI is much more capable than a human mind, and machine translation (MT) is just a simple task compared to the tasks for which artificial intelligence will soon be used. In this essay, I will argue that MT will be if not more, as accurate as human translation, and it will take the place of human translation in the near future. To begin with, large-scale technology companies such as Google and Microsoft believe that MT will someday be as accurate as human translation, and they invest greatly in research and development of MT technology. Those tech companies develop products, which will provide an instant translation at a minimal cost. The technology behind those products is machine learning, and machine learning algorithms get better as they have more input and output samples. Therefore, I think it is just a matter of time for MT to be as accurate as human translation. On the other hand, there is a good number of people who argue that translation is an artistic work, and MT will never be able to translate literary works. Reason for this is that translation of literary works sometimes requires adaptation of the text, as literature by its nature comprises cultural elements. Those cultural elements, even if accurately translated, will not be understandable for those who are not familiar with the culture. A possible solution could be recognition of translation of literary works as a type of art, that way it could be ensured that it would not be evaluated as a shortcoming of MT. To conclude, at the first glance, there seem to be some shortcomings of MT, and some may argue that MT will never be as accurate or as beautiful as human translation. However, If you exclude the translation of literary works and recognize that type of translation as a type of art, considering the scales of research and development practices of tech companies and progress so far, it is clear that mankind will soon witness perfect machine translations.

Let's write an IELTS essay #3 --In most countries multinational companies and their products are becoming more and more important. This trend is seriously damaging our quality of life.-- With the advent of globalization, many multinational companies aim to reach every single consumer on the planet. However, the adverse effects of that trend have recently sparked some heated controversy. While some analysts argue that as multinational companies spread throughout the world, our quality of life gets better, some claim that disastrous consequences of that trend outweigh the benefits. In this essay, I will argue that operations of the multicultural companies should be regulated by authorities to minimize the damages on our quality of life, only that way they can serve humanity. To begin with, many large-scale multinational companies contribute to humanity’s social and economic development. This is largely because, those companies create job opportunities in various parts of the world, whereby they decrease the unemployment levels in countless countries. For example, in my country, Turkey, a good number of multinational companies conduct operations. Those companies generally offer higher wages and better working conditions compared to the local ones. It is therefore clear that, multinational companies increase the quality of life of a percentage of employees. On the other hand, local businesses suffer from financial losses as multinational companies target their customers. Reason for this is that cost of services and goods are lower for large scale companies. As a result small to mid-scale businesses cannot compete with them. For instance, a popular multinational restaurant chain, McDonalds threw a considerable number of local restaurants out of the competition in numerous countries. Thus, it is safe to claim that multinational countries destroy not only the local businesses, but also the local cultures. To conclude, in some ways multinational companies damage the quality of life of the society, however, in other ways they create opportunities for local peoples. It is obvious that, a clear-cut answer to the question whether the harmful effects of multinational companies on our quality of life outweigh the benefits require a quantitative sociological research, which is beyond the scope of this essay. Nevertheless, to minimize the damages, governmental and intergovernmental authorities should intervene with the operations of multinational companies in order to protect the competition.

Let's write an IELTS essay #2 Societies with a heritage in the arts have long been considered culturally sophisticated. However, the question of to what extent financial resources should be allocated for the development of the arts has always sparked heated controversy. While some commentators claim that spending money on the arts is a waste of financial resources, some argue that the arts are a vital part of the society, and as long as the money is spent in a well-planned fashion, the arts will increase the quality of life in a society. In this essay, I will argue that the government should make a good amount of expenditure on the arts not only to foster the social, but also the economic develepment of the society. To begin with, the more a society spends time on the arts, the more advanced it becomes in other areas such as science and technology. This is largely because, the arts remove the limitaions of human mind helping people imagine what has never imagined before. Leonarda Da Vinci is a famous example in that he is both an engineer and artist. He has designed a good number of flying machines, one of which is what we today call a helicopter. He also contributed vastly to the anatomy. It is therefore clear that art and science feed each other, and a development in the arts will translate into advancements in the science and technology. On the other hand, some argue that in almost every country, a good percentage of the population suffers from poverty, and spending money on the arts is not a priority for the society. Reason for this is that the money spent on the arts could be spent in a way that the government could provide shelter and food for the poor, and create job opportunities for the unemployed people. For instance, even though it has the greatest economy in the world, there is a vast number of poor people in the United States. Consequently, Spending money on the arts, while it is possible to use that money to fight with poverty seems irrational for some people. To conclude, not allocating any financial resources for the arts would deprieve the development of science and technology. Underdevelopment of science and technology will eventually hamper the economic growth. Nevertheless, spending too much money on the arts will worsen the conditions of life of the poor in the short run. Seen in this light, it is clear that government expenditure on the arts is vital for the overall development of a country as long as the money is spent in a well-planned fashion.

Let's write an IELTS essay #1 ---Some people believe that teaching children at home is best for a child’s development while others think that it is important for children to go to school. Discuss the advantages of both methods and give your own opinion.--- In recent decades, throughout the world many parents have chosen to have their children to be taught at home, albeit at a cost in the children's social life. While traditionalists claim that social development of the children will suffer greatly if parents choose to teach them at home, more liberal minded people defend the idea that every child is unique in his abilities and accordingly he should be taught in a unique way. In this essay, I will explain why education at home is more effective than the traditional education at school. To begin with, efficiency of conventional schools is very low. This is because, almost all schools teach in the same way, while abilities of children widely vary; some children have difficulties in learning, some of them are extraordinarily intelligent. For example, one child might be very talented in languages, and he has the ability to learn several languages. However, most of the schools do not have the means to teach several languages. To give another example, schools generally do not have special programs for children with learning disabilities. Therefore, it is to be expected that not every child is suitable to be taught at school. Secondly, the social life at school often times does not pose an advantage. Reason for this is that in some of the neighborhoods with a low socio-cultural level and a poor economic development, children affect each other in a negative way. For instance, some children bully other children or some older children commit sexual crimes on other children. Consequently, it is to be expected that at such schools, children would be in danger to be harmed thus, social life at school is not always a positive factor in development of a child. In conclusion, I strongly agree with the notion that education at home is more benefical for children, since every child could be educated according to his talents and abilities that way. Also, in some of the cases that type of education is essential to protect the child. In the future, there might be a hybrid education system that would make use of the best sides of the conventional education and education at home.

ЕСЛИ НЕ МОЖЕШЬ СДЕЛАТЬ ПОДАРОК, КАК С ТОБОЙ ДРУЖИТЬ В нашей стране подарок — это часть культуры. Как и везде, мода на подарки и отношение к ним постоянно меняются. А между тем есть у нас известная и мудрая поговорка, которая гласит, что “az veren maldan, çok veren candan”. Нельзя сделать подарок по принципу ‘дорого—богато’, подарок должен быть от души. — Что такое подарок по-турецки? — спрашиваете вы у одной турецкой бабушки. — Он значимая часть жизни, — отвечает она; в это самое время вы думаете, что “у нас тоже”. — Он должен быть со смыслом, и желательно, чтобы он имел практическое применение, — прибавляет она. Так что вы не находите какую-то особенную прелесть в этом ответе. Однажды, возможно, вы находитесь на традиционной турецкой свадьбе. Вы ищите там турецкие подарки со смыслом. Вы замечаете, что эти подарки лишь золотые браслеты, монетки даже денежные купюры. Ну разве эти подарки имеют глубокий смысл для молодоженов?

"Две разные вещи" и "две разных войны" Я понимаю, что когда "число + прилагательное + мужской род", прилагательное множественного число в родительном падеже употребляется. Например: "Два разних человека" "Два разных мира" А когда "число + прилагательное + женский род", не понимаю как будет. Я нашел эти примеры в национальном корпусе русского языка: "Две разные группы" "Две разные истории" "Две разные вещи" "Две разные деловые культуры" С другой стороны, есть и такие примеры: "Две разных войны" "Две разных сферы" "Две разных экономики" Помогите понять причины отличий в окончаниях.

Я Перевел Стихотворение на Русский))) Три Языка Надо знать хотя бы три языка Хотя бы на трёх языках Надо уметь послать по матери Надо знать хотя бы три языка Хотя бы на трёх языках, надо думать и видеть сны Хотя бы три языка Один — родной Твой как свои руки и ноги Как и материнское молоко сладкий Как и материнское молоко бесплатный Колыбельные, сказки, еще и мать А другие языки чужие семь раз Каждое слово во рту льва Каждое слово изо всех сил Надо подхватить как будто вырываешь с корнем С каждым словом поднимешься на высоте кирпича С каждым словом вырастаешь в два раза больше Надо знать хотя бы три языка Хотя бы на трёх языках Надо уметь сказать 'душечка' 'Красная роза капли крови роняет...' 'Где тонко, там и рвётся' 'Броситься в омут с головой' 'За двумя зайцами погонишься, ни одного не поймаешь' 'Эксплуатация человека человеком' 'Поистине возмутительно' Да нет не только сказать Надо щебетать Надо знать хотя бы три языка Хотя бы на трёх языках Надо уметь послать по матери Хотя бы три языка Ибо нет ни истории, ни географии особенной у твоей страны Бедный мой сын Ты ребёнок народа который уже проворонил свой шанс Бедри Рахми Эйупоглу