Your review is comprehensible but sometimes you've used complex expressions which have actually made the review more difficult to understand. Despite that, it's still impressive that you've used them. Do you feel like visiting a museum of history or contemporary art? I’ve always chosen the first option but not this time. > This reads a bit strangely because "do you feel like...?" is more of an invitation rather than a question about preferences. Perhaps you mean "Do you usually visit history museums or art galleries? I've always visited the former but this time, I didn't." The museum I’m going to review is a rare example when the interior is much more sophisticated than the exterior of the building. Nestled in the former building of car dealership, Museum of Contemporary Art in Perm catches you at first sight. > It's easier for the reader to understand the review if you mention the name of the museum in your first sentence. Also, it helps if you add an explanation after using the expression "catches you at first sight" e.g. "Recently, I went to visit the Museum of Contemporary Art in Perm. Situated in a former car dealership (you can use other words but "nestled" suggests it's only in a small corner of the car dealership), the museum catches you at first sight because it is a rare example of when an interior is much more sophisticated than the exterior of a building." It’s a daunting task to find a person in Perm unfamiliar with the museum. > "Daunting" means something that is intimidating or scary. I'd use "difficult" here e.g. It's difficult to find someone in Perm who has not heard of the museum. I can't correct the rest because I think there's a word limit, but I hope this correction helps you!

Thank you :)