Could you please correct my appeal PM to a community moderator? The goal is: Sound formal, natural. Present the arguments persuasively (feel free to modify the expression and rewrite) and stay humble and respectful to mods. Thank you. ----- I apologize for the late reply. I have been this busy last week. [Do not omit the subject of a sentence in formal English.] To be fair, don't you think a warning of “5 years, 11 months” is too harsh for this case? You didn't mention it specifically, but I assume the rule you referred to as being violated is this one: [insert screenshot of the rule here] Please, let's be honest. The standard of “zero effort and spam” is confusing without external [external? I think you might mean something like, "further"] explanation since it is very subjective. The question is this: where do we draw the line? The line is very vague unless it is refined and clarified as you did in the first message, quote: “often in the meditation genre, use recycled music and fake artists”. However, the rule itself lacked such clear phrasing, and the wiki page extending the explanation of this rule/clarifying this rule did not exist two years ago. In fact, there was no clear definition of this rule in the entire wiki or the rules when these torrents were uploaded. The ambiguity in the wording of this rule does lead to misunderstanding and unintentional violations in this case, and it's unfair to hold the member fully accountable. Wouldn't you agree that this is possible or perhaps even likely? Therefore, here I humbly plead with you to reconsider your judgment, taking the aforementioned factors into account. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, ___________