Hello.
Can somebody, please, tell me what may be there in the interval 21-23 sec.(in the bracketed part)?
https://voca.ro/1bvCcE00iBzS

"And so we have no particular evidence that it was actually contemporary with his reign and good reason to suspect that it might not be because the one of the first tack... texts that appear is in fact - the first one in its full form - it's an addition, this is the text that's copying and expanding an earlier work. In the early work doesn't use the term at all. It just calls him Æthelred. And then in this, um..., the (leggis and glory on the) nearly 13th century, they then add to it - Unræd.

Question

Hello.
Can somebody, please, tell me what may be there in the interval 21-23 sec.(in the bracketed part)?
https://voca.ro/1bvCcE00iBzS

"And so we have no particular evidence that it was actually contemporary with his reign and good reason to suspect that it might not be because the one of the first tack... texts that appear is in fact - the first one in its full form - it's an addition, this is the text that's copying and expanding an earlier work. In the early work doesn't use the term at all. It just calls him Æthelred. And then in this, um..., the (leggis and glory on the) nearly 13th century, they then add to it - Unræd.

Answer

Yes, it's rather blurred here. 
It is from the "Gone Medieval" podcast about Æthelred the Unready. 
I jut wanted to get to the point.in some obscure places.

Answer

It sounded like "legge sanglore" to me, which is of course meaningless.

Maybe "legge" is "Liege" and "san glore" is "Saint Gloire"?

This is a job for a scholar of medieval English, I reckon!