Both sentences—"He is adept at writing" and "He is good at writing"—are natural, but they convey slightly different tones and levels of proficiency: 1. "He is adept at writing" Meaning: Indicates a high degree of skill or proficiency, often implying a more nuanced, practiced expertise. Tone: More formal and sophisticated. Commonly used in written language or in professional/academic contexts. Example Contexts: Describing someone's skill on a resume or in a formal assessment: "She is adept at managing complex projects." Academic or literary analysis: "The author is adept at creating vivid characters." 2. "He is good at writing" Meaning: Suggests general competence or above-average ability in writing. Tone: More casual and conversational. It’s widely used in everyday speech and informal writing. Example Contexts: Talking about a friend’s skills: "John is really good at playing the piano." In everyday conversation: "She’s good at explaining things." Key Differences: Formality: "Adept" is more formal, while "good" is informal. Intensity: "Adept" implies a higher or more specialized level of skill compared to "good." Synonym Variations: "Excel at" implies outstanding performance: "He excels at writing essays." "Be expert in" denotes deep, specialized knowledge: "She is an expert in medieval literature." "Do well in" is broader and often used with subjects or tasks: "He does well in English class." So, if you're aiming for a more formal tone or emphasizing a higher level of skill, "He is adept at writing" works well. In casual conversations, "He is good at writing" is perfectly fine.

Yes, "He is adept at writing" sounds natural but is more formal and commonly used in written or professional contexts. "He is good at writing" is more casual and commonly used in everyday spoken English. Both phrases have a similar meaning, but "adept" implies a higher level of skill and suggests expertise or mastery, while "good" is more general.

Yes, you can say it that way. 'Adept' will sound slightly formal, but you could say it as well as write it that way. It has the same general meaning as 'he is good at writing.' You can also say: 'He is a good/great/ excellent/skilled/talented writer.'

In speech, we use the contraction “He’s” for “He is” unless there is a good reason not to. ‘Adept’ is more precise. For example: Q. Do you hear much from your son who’s overseas? A. Yeah, he’s good at writing. (This means that he answers my letters regularly, not that he’s skilled. It’s unambiguous because of the context.)

Yes, "He is adept at writing" sounds natural and is commonly used, though it may be slightly more formal or academic in tone. It's not limited to written language; it can be used in both spoken and written contexts, though it might be a bit more sophisticated or less casual than "He is good at writing." While both phrases ("He is adept at writing" and "He is good at writing") convey a similar meaning, there is a subtle difference: "He is good at writing" is more common and straightforward, implying competence in writing. "He is adept at writing" suggests a higher level of skill, implying proficiency or expertise. So, "adept" generally conveys a stronger or more refined level of skill than simply being "good" at something.