Search from various English teachers...
Ryota
Can I use the sentence 1 instead of sentence 2?
1) The government increased the duty on wine that there was a fall in demand.
2) The government increased the duty on wine. As a result, there was a fall in demand.
Jan 31, 2024 12:07 AM
Answers · 2
No, number 1 makes sense while number 2 doesn't.
January 31, 2024
No, you can't ; (1) is grammatically incorrect. However if you insert the word 'so', implying consequence, before 'that' it will work :
'The government increased the duty on wine so that there was a fall in demand.' It is implied that the government deliberately increased the duty to reduce demand. If you add 'so' but omit 'that' it implies that the fall in demand was not necessarily intended. Sentence (2) conforms with either of these, as it does not state whether the increase in duty was intended to reduce demand.
January 31, 2024
Still haven’t found your answers?
Write down your questions and let the native speakers help you!
Ryota
Language Skills
English, Japanese
Learning Language
English
Articles You May Also Like

Same Word, Different Meaning: American, British, and South African English
22 likes · 17 Comments

How to Sound Confident in English (Even When You’re Nervous)
17 likes · 13 Comments

Marketing Vocabulary and Phrases for Business English Learners
15 likes · 6 Comments
More articles
