Find English Teachers
MurrEvgenia
That was more interesting than I expected (The Past Simple)
OR
That was more interesting than I'd expected (The Past Perfect)
Which sentence sounds more natural? And why?
Jan 20, 2025 1:40 PM
Answers · 2
1
Both sentences are correct, but they differ slightly in nuance:
1. "That was more interesting than I expected" (Past Simple):
This is straightforward and neutral. It implies you had a certain expectation, and the experience exceeded it. It's commonly used in casual conversation.
2. "That was more interesting than I'd expected" (Past Perfect):
This is slightly more formal or reflective. It emphasizes the earlier expectation (before the event happened) and its contrast with the outcome. It can suggest a bit more thought or surprise.
Most natural: The Past Simple ("I expected") is more common in everyday speech because it's simpler and works well for general observations. The Past Perfect ("I'd expected") is often used when the timeline or context requires extra clarity.
Jan 21, 2025 4:49 AM
1
Those are two perfect sentences that mean different things.
Jan 20, 2025 10:37 PM
Still haven’t found your answers?
Write down your questions and let the native speakers help you!
MurrEvgenia
Language Skills
English, Russian
Learning Language
English
Articles You May Also Like

Speak More Fluently with This Simple Technique
23 likes · 2 Comments

How to Read and Understand a Business Contract in English
19 likes · 3 Comments

6 Ways italki Can Help You Succeed in Your School Language Classes
15 likes · 8 Comments
More articles