Search from various English teachers...
MurrEvgenia
That was more interesting than I expected (The Past Simple)
OR
That was more interesting than I'd expected (The Past Perfect)
Which sentence sounds more natural? And why?
Jan 20, 2025 1:40 PM
Answers · 2
1
Both sentences are correct, but they differ slightly in nuance:
1. "That was more interesting than I expected" (Past Simple):
This is straightforward and neutral. It implies you had a certain expectation, and the experience exceeded it. It's commonly used in casual conversation.
2. "That was more interesting than I'd expected" (Past Perfect):
This is slightly more formal or reflective. It emphasizes the earlier expectation (before the event happened) and its contrast with the outcome. It can suggest a bit more thought or surprise.
Most natural: The Past Simple ("I expected") is more common in everyday speech because it's simpler and works well for general observations. The Past Perfect ("I'd expected") is often used when the timeline or context requires extra clarity.
January 21, 2025
1
Those are two perfect sentences that mean different things.
January 20, 2025
Still haven’t found your answers?
Write down your questions and let the native speakers help you!
MurrEvgenia
Language Skills
English, Russian
Learning Language
English
Articles You May Also Like

Santa, St. Nicholas, or Father Christmas? How Christmas Varies Across English-Speaking Countries
6 likes · 4 Comments

Reflecting on Your Progress: Year-End Language Journal Prompts
5 likes · 2 Comments

Same Word, Different Meaning: American, British, and South African English
25 likes · 18 Comments
More articles
