Search from various English teachers...
Konstantin
grammar
Tell me please is there any difference between the use of could be avoided or could have been avoided. I don't understand if they both refer to the past. Gimme please a few examples. Thanks!
Feb 4, 2015 12:42 PM
Answers · 24
3
The phrase "could have been avoided" refers to the past, but not "could be avoided". For example, referring to a past event, "the accident could have been avoided through proper maintenance procedures". In the future, "accidents could be avoided".
February 4, 2015
2
they both can refer to the past with some difference in meaning.
'duels could be avoided' means that it was possible in past to avoid duels, it refers to a 'state', 'general truth'.
'the duel could have been avoided' refers to some duel that took place but could have been avoided.
Study this: https://learnenglish.britishcouncil.org/en/english-grammar/verbs/modal-verbs/can-could-and-could-have
February 4, 2015
1
'Could be avoided' can also be used in the present and future contexts. You might talk about something you are doing that could be avoided, whilst 'could have been avoided' is only a past tense.
February 4, 2015
thank You ALL a lot for giving so many attention to my question!!!
February 5, 2015
So let that be a lesson to me! I jumped straight for the future use of "could be avoided" and completely forgot about that particular past use. It could not be used for the case of the Titanic: it would only have a future meaning, and would not mean 1912 !
February 4, 2015
Show more
Still haven’t found your answers?
Write down your questions and let the native speakers help you!
Konstantin
Language Skills
English, Russian, Ukrainian
Learning Language
English
Articles You May Also Like

Same Word, Different Meaning: American, British, and South African English
22 likes · 17 Comments

How to Sound Confident in English (Even When You’re Nervous)
17 likes · 12 Comments

Marketing Vocabulary and Phrases for Business English Learners
14 likes · 6 Comments
More articles
