Find English Teachers
Danyel
Thе cakе would havе burnt іf І hadn't gonе... Thе cakе would havе burnt іf І hadn't gonе to thе kіtchеn. & Thе cakе would havе been burnt іf І hadn't gonе to thе kіtchеn. What is the difference?
Apr 29, 2017 9:35 AM
Answers · 2
1
As Micahel helpfully explains, "the cake would have burnt" is referring to the action of the cake burning, whereas "the cake would have been burnt" refers to the final result - a burnt cake! --- Want to learn English the SMART (Stretch, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, Timely) way with me? Go to my teacher profile and book your $1 trial lesson now! http://bit.ly/paulblakemanitalkiteacher
April 29, 2017
1
to be burnt - burnt is a past participle which is being used as an adjective to describe the state of the cake. to burn - verb to describe the activity in this case within itself (the cake); there is no direct object There is no significant difference in meaning in this case.
April 29, 2017
Still haven’t found your answers?
Write down your questions and let the native speakers help you!