Dinghui
"get at the metal in the guts of gadgets."? "because workers burn plastic coatings to get at the metal in the guts of gadgets." why not say "get the metal in the guts of gadgets"?20141103-Better E-Waste Handling Helps Environment and Health The town of Agbogbloshie in the west African country of Ghana has been called a digital dumping ground. Millions of tons of discarded electronics wind up there annually, so people can try to recover anything of value. It’s therefore one of the most polluted places in the world, because workers burn plastic coatings to get at the metal in the guts of gadgets. But Agbogbloshie is about to get cleaner, thanks to the opening of a new facility for handling such e-waste. Four machines that can strip plastic will prevent the burning that produces hazardous smoke. E-waste is a large and growing problem thanks to the large and growing appetite for electronics. Responsible recyclers exist, but too much e-waste still ends up being exported and improperly disposed of in places like Agbogbloshie. The worst e-waste remains batteries. The most common type, lead-acid batteries, are classified as toxic waste once used. And more and more rechargeable lithium ion batteries are finding their way into landfills and other unsafe disposal sites. But the problem of e-waste can be solved with proper recycling. The new machines in Agbogbloshie should be able to strip enough wires to produce about 10 metric tons of copper a month. That's good news for livelihoods—and lungs—of local residents. —David Biello
Jul 2, 2017 8:32 AM
Answers · 7
1
Both ways of saying it are correct. "To get at" something is just slightly more colorful way of saying to obtain. "To get at" very slightly implies you have to travel, or dig, or in some other way there is a process involved before you can obtain or complete the object of the phrase. Since guts are inside something, using 'to get at' is, like guts, is just an imaginative phrasing.
July 2, 2017
Both could be correct and mean that they want to take the metal out. get at could also mean they want to reach it, but don't want to take it out. They want to fix it for example. (Not in the context of your article)
July 2, 2017
First, the writer is obviously being clever by saying it in a way that it almost like poetry--"get," "guts," "gadgets" starting with the same letter, and "get" and "metal" having assonance in the "e" sound. "To get at" and "to get" mean different things. "To get at" means "to reach, to access." "To get" means "to take, obtain." Before they can get the metal, first they need to get at the place inside the device where the metal is.
July 2, 2017
Still haven’t found your answers?
Write down your questions and let the native speakers help you!