Search from various English teachers...
dolco
You must have me confused with someone else.
1. You must have me confused with someone else.
2. You must have confused me with someone else.
Some say the problem in question is nothing but tense: The first means "You are mistaking me with others" while the second "You were~".
But, what I really wonder is that doesn't the 'confused' in the first take the roles of adjective? I get the whole sentence's meaning, but when I see the 'confused' part only, it seems to be ungrammatical, since the 'me' is the one who's confusing.
Mar 8, 2019 9:46 AM
Answers · 7
You're right. It's a tricky grammatical construction to spot.
to have + object person + complement
Here's another example: "I've always had you down as a Arsenal fan but I'm glad to hear that you support West Ham United."
March 8, 2019
You must have me confused with someone else.
You must be confusing me with someone else.
You must have had me confused with someone else.
You must have confused me with someone else.
March 8, 2019
Still haven’t found your answers?
Write down your questions and let the native speakers help you!
dolco
Language Skills
English, Korean
Learning Language
English
Articles You May Also Like

How to Ask for a Raise or Promotion in English
9 likes · 8 Comments

The Key to Learning a Language Faster
29 likes · 8 Comments

Why "General English" is Failing Your Career (An Engineer’s Perspective)
30 likes · 12 Comments
More articles
