Search from various English teachers...
dolco
You must have me confused with someone else.
1. You must have me confused with someone else.
2. You must have confused me with someone else.
Some say the problem in question is nothing but tense: The first means "You are mistaking me with others" while the second "You were~".
But, what I really wonder is that doesn't the 'confused' in the first take the roles of adjective? I get the whole sentence's meaning, but when I see the 'confused' part only, it seems to be ungrammatical, since the 'me' is the one who's confusing.
Mar 8, 2019 9:46 AM
Answers · 7
You're right. It's a tricky grammatical construction to spot.
to have + object person + complement
Here's another example: "I've always had you down as a Arsenal fan but I'm glad to hear that you support West Ham United."
March 8, 2019
You must have me confused with someone else.
You must be confusing me with someone else.
You must have had me confused with someone else.
You must have confused me with someone else.
March 8, 2019
Still haven’t found your answers?
Write down your questions and let the native speakers help you!
dolco
Language Skills
English, Korean
Learning Language
English
Articles You May Also Like

Same Word, Different Meaning: American, British, and South African English
18 likes · 16 Comments

How to Sound Confident in English (Even When You’re Nervous)
15 likes · 12 Comments

Marketing Vocabulary and Phrases for Business English Learners
13 likes · 6 Comments
More articles
