Politicians and film stars need privacy

FCE

Nowadays there is no limit to gossip and speculation. Unfortunately, in fact, a lot of well-known figures don't have control of their own privacy anymore.

However, notoriety and fame help people to be easily noticed and to stand out from the crowd. Therefore these days because of the massive importance of social networks such as twitter, facebook Those who belong to the start system don't need a photographer to show off their person anymore but they can do it themselves by uploading intimate shots on instagram.

On the other hand, this doesn't justify the extreme behaviour of some pedant journalists. What we all deserve in our lives is reciprocal respect and politeness, it's the same for people in the public eye who, in several cases, can't even eat without being continuously phographed though.

To sum up, the borderline between violation and curiosity ought to be always clear in order not to jeopardise other people's freedom.

Hello Penelope,

This is a nice FCE writing, it is correctly laid out and addresses both sides of the argument. It flows well with quite good use of connectors. I had a problem with one word in blue, I am not sure what you are trying to say unless you mean 'the smart set'.

Take care with 'have', if it is being used as a main verb then it needs to be negated with 'do' the same as other verbs. It is only when it is an auxiliary such as in the present perfect that have gets negated itself.

Hope this helps

Bob