[Deleted]
Why is the indicative mood rather than subjuctive mood? (detailed topic inside) Why did the conditional clause use subjunctive mood, while the main clause used indicative mood (i.e. past simple) rather than subjuctive mood (e.g. would do or be)? - If it were gentle, only the more unstable rods fell. If it were severe, they all fell.
Oct 3, 2016 4:02 AM
Answers · 6
1
I'm not sure there's much to explain here except that the writer made a mistake. The correct sentence would use your alternative: If it were gentle, only the more unstable rods would fall. If it were severe, they would all fall. Another possibility would be a mixed conditional, which mixes a present condition with a hypothetical past result: If it were gentle, only the more unstable rods would have fallen. If it were severe, they would all have fallen (actually, I'm not even sure what this sentence even means...I'm assuming “it" refers to wind, that's the only "it" word I can think of that collocates with "gentle" and “severe”.)
October 3, 2016
Still haven’t found your answers?
Write down your questions and let the native speakers help you!