Language exchange Hi !

I'm gogui and I'm looking for a partner for a language exchange in skype now !

I can help you in French!

Bye

Can you help me with this note ? Warm welcome and good advises despite our visit ten minutes before the closure. The house's specialty (coffee with lemon) was very tasty.

We recommend this place for a good coffee experience !

Language exchange Hello, i'm gogui and i'm looking for a partner to exchange in english.

See ya!

Is Air bnb an unfair competition for the hostel owner? At first sight, Airbnb and hostel are not the same things: on the one hand, Airbnb is a internet platform which connects people who search affordable housing and people who offer their housing during their absence. On the other hand, the hotel is most of all a service: it allows to find easily a room wherever you want for any budget and with a real delivery.

But, very fast, many people used air bnb like a mean to earn money. This financial logic has many negatives consequences for the economy, especially for the tourism economy.

First and foremost, it is essential to say that the owners on airbnb are most of the time private people. The hoteliers or hotels owners are necessarily professionals. They have some strict obligations while the private people who rent their housing are less constrained.

Normally, private people cannot rent their housing very often because of the legal system and especially the taxes are really different according to the situation. If you rent often your housing, you become a trader and you must respect a lot of rules (security, taxes...). But, if you rent your house occasionally, we consider that it’s an exceptional situation and we don’t must respect this types of rules.

It’s a very difficult situation for the hotel owners who must respect the tourism reglementation: they have the impression that the concurrence is unfair.

To conclude, many hotel owner looking for a solution to fight this fierce concurrence. But, the government must regulate the personal rent too.

Marijuana’s taboo I think it’s a really passionate debate.

First of all, it’s necessary to define and classified the marijuana : according the wikipedia’s definition, it’s a «  psychoactive drug from the Cannabis plant used for medical or recreational purposes ».

For most of the medicals authorities, the marijuana is a dangerous drug who makes an addiction an have an effect on the brain's development. I totally agree with that.

But, I think that the marijuana is not the only product which has this type of effects: alcohol, Tobacco are just as dangerous but they are allowed. This comparaison shows that we apply a double standards.

Basically, I think that we have a taboo around this substance and it’s very shame.

Why think I that ?

Firstly, I think if you allowed the alcool and the tobacco, we must to allowed the marijuana. The authorities must apply for the same position about all of these products.

Secondly, as for me, the marijuana is a precious tool when it is used for medical reasons because it allows decreasing the pain of the illness. More precisely, for people who have incurable illness, it’s and efficient treatment against the pain. However, due to the taboo around the marijuana, illness people who consumed that substance are sue by the justice. I think it’s deeply unfair. We are therefore thinking with our feet !

To conclude, I think that things are changing. More and more countries adapt their legislation and allow this product. As for me, the regulation bring safety and avoid traffics.

The power of the Television I think that TV is a beautiful invention, but many people use it too much. They pass all their spare time in front of their Tv and they are focused on it. It’s like a drug.

The tv is a good device because it allows connecting people between them. For many people, it’s like a companion. It’s a good mean to fight the loneliness. But, the use of it is not controlled and many viewers become an addict.

But, As for me, the main issue is that the viewers are passive: they don’t participate in the broadcast and often they like the same things. Moreover, the content is very poor, especially on the main channel.

That is true that you can access to a diversity of program: but more often, the better program are not diffused on the prime time. And often, If you want to watch a good program, we need to pay or support a lot of advertising.

Moreover, exposure to the screen is not good for the brain, especially when you're a child: it may delay our brain development. Many studies have shown that the screen has a bad effect on the sleeping. Eventually, many people are tired because they passed too much time in front of their Tv before sleeping.

Furthermore, the Tv takes all your spare time: we don't use this time to do something else, like reading. It’s very pitty. It doesn't’ develop your critical thinking.

Finally, I would like to say that the Tv is a media who helps many companies to control the people. Actually, the Tv is the perfect support for the advertising: the broadcasting is global and the viewer are loyal.

Happiness - how to define the happiness ? In our society, the happiness is narrow linked with the money. But, according to many studies, the people who have much money aren’t the happiest. Moreover, the money isn’t at all : in fact, how do you be happy when you are unhealthy?

I know that having money is important to be happy but it’s not fundamental. The happiness is first of all a spirit minded who depends where we place the cursor.

In a materialistic society, it is necessary to have a minimum of money to live correctly, especially when the welfare system is not really developed. Without money, you cannot leave anywhere you want and it’s not very easy to have a social life because many activities are not free. In fact, you are limited by your means. Of course, money may not buy happiness but it helps to leave correctly.

But, often, when you have money, you are looking for to have more and more. It’s never ending. You have a lot of things but it’s always not enough. You become unhappiness because you don’t have this or this thing.

In reality, in the two situations you’re not satisfied : but, as for me,when you have not enough money, the life is objectively more difficult. All the time, you need to make choice : you’re permanently stressed with increased mental workload and your choices are reduced. When you have money, I think that your issues are not vitals but superficials. They are not insurmontable and you can easely life with them. On the contrary, When you have money issues, they polite your spirit and create many fears that prevent you from moving.