Note that in this sequence of remarks there is an avoidance of the implications found in the Dual Version, which includes as part of one of the subdialogues, “Since it has…,” rather than “does not have,” the Buddha-nature. There is an original condition that precedes and is, thus, unfettered by the contradiction of neither strictly having nor not having a primordial spiritual endowment. Here, he endorses a view of primordial temporality that is discussed in numerous other fascicles, especially “Being-Time”, by making a claim that “already existing might seem to indicate one of several forms of existence, but in fact already existing shines alone.” The very words “entering into,” he suggests, are superfluous because there is no distinction between immanence and transcendence, or manifesting and not manifesting in the flesh. In any event, “the act of entering into this skin-bag is not committed erroneously or in vain” and can help lead to an awakening in that mundane existence is inseparable from nirvana.