"I'm just taking it to get rewired." no object?
A: "What are you doing with the lamp?"
B: "I'm just taking it to get rewired."

I feel like the second sentence's missing sth and there should be an object, it(the lamp), between get and rewired, like "I'm taking it to get *it* rewired."

Are the original sentence and the one with extra *it* both okay or is it incorrect with *it* thus I should not put it in the sentence?

Question

"I'm just taking it to get rewired." no object?
A: "What are you doing with the lamp?"
B: "I'm just taking it to get rewired."

I feel like the second sentence's missing sth and there should be an object, it(the lamp), between get and rewired, like "I'm taking it to get *it* rewired."

Are the original sentence and the one with extra *it* both okay or is it incorrect with *it* thus I should not put it in the sentence?

Answer

They are both correct but the first example sounds better to a native. No idea why lol. You could also use the second one and be understood no problem

Answer

I have a lamp to repair.
I have a lamp to be repaired.

So..one is active and the other is passive. both of these are okay?

Answer

hello my dear how are you
i'm here to learn language and i will also love to establish a relationship with you.please contact me on my private address so we can discuss more about each other  and exchange photos because i'm not always online here

guzmanlucy1985@gmail.com

Answer

Here, the infinitive is an object complement which adds information about the object.

I have work.
I have work to do.

I have a broken lamp.
I have a lamp to repair.
I have a lamp to be repaired.  (or - I have a lamp to get repaired.)
I am taking it to be repaired (at the repair shop). (or - ... to get repaired.)
I am taking it (to the repair shop) to be repaired. (or - ... to get repaired.)

Answer

How many objects do you want? There is one "it" already, it's the object.