Konstantin
grammar Tell me please is there any difference between the use of could be avoided or could have been avoided. I don't understand if they both refer to the past. Gimme please a few examples. Thanks!
4 Thg 02 2015 12:42
Câu trả lời · 24
3
The phrase "could have been avoided" refers to the past, but not "could be avoided". For example, referring to a past event, "the accident could have been avoided through proper maintenance procedures". In the future, "accidents could be avoided".
4 tháng 2 năm 2015
2
they both can refer to the past with some difference in meaning. 'duels could be avoided' means that it was possible in past to avoid duels, it refers to a 'state', 'general truth'. 'the duel could have been avoided' refers to some duel that took place but could have been avoided. Study this: https://learnenglish.britishcouncil.org/en/english-grammar/verbs/modal-verbs/can-could-and-could-have
4 tháng 2 năm 2015
1
'Could be avoided' can also be used in the present and future contexts. You might talk about something you are doing that could be avoided, whilst 'could have been avoided' is only a past tense.
4 tháng 2 năm 2015
thank You ALL a lot for giving so many attention to my question!!!
5 tháng 2 năm 2015
So let that be a lesson to me! I jumped straight for the future use of "could be avoided" and completely forgot about that particular past use. It could not be used for the case of the Titanic: it would only have a future meaning, and would not mean 1912 !
4 tháng 2 năm 2015
Hiển thị thêm
Bạn vẫn không tìm thấy được các câu trả lời cho mình?
Hãy viết xuống các câu hỏi của bạn và để cho người bản xứ giúp bạn!