Which one is correct ?

Hello everyone  ! :)

 

Considering the two following sentences, which one is correct and why ?

 

Ex.1. "This can contribute to improve the quality of life of all people."
Ex.2. "This can contribute to improving the quality of life of all people."

 

Also, when do we use to+ing ? How do we know when we are supposed t use to+ing or to+ verb ?

I hope that I am saying makes sense...

Thank you for your time, best regards

France This document is an article entitled Air France: after an agitated day, the direction claims to be ready to resume the negotiations. It was taken from a French newspaper « le monde » published on October 5th 2015. This text focuses on Air France crisis and more precisely on the employees anger following the announce of the abolition of thousands posts. So the question is : how to explain the anger of Air France employees ? To begin with I will explain the reasons of the conflict in Air France then I will talk about then I will talk about the anger and the violence of the employees further to the announcement of the decisions The reasons of the conflict in Air France In recent years, Air France is confronted with a rather significant reduction in its growth. It makes less and less profits because of the increase of the competition and especially the low-cost. To be more competitive, Air France want to set up a restructuring plan named « perform ». The measures are pretty drastic since it lead to the abolition of thousands posts. To be more precise, 300 airline pilots, 900 stewards and stewardess and finally 700 ground staff if not more would lose their jobs. So the situation is noticeably more and more strained What is worst is all of this is that trade unions and Air force cannot reach an agreement. Indeed, AF want his employees to work more without being paid more but employees refuse. The situation is critical, going from bad to worse. Since the arrival of the new CEO 2011, almost 15000 people have lost their job.

Reactions The anger and the violence of the employees further to the announcement of the decisions These workforce reductions have catastrophic consequences since it provoke the anger of Air France employees. A few days ago, during a meeting with the trade union, Air France executives have confirmed the possibility of the abolition of 2900 posts. Following this announcement, Air France employees have demonstrated against workforce reduction. The demonstration has turned violent since some employees have assaulted the executives. Human resources manager Xavier Broseta had his shirt ripped off as he climbed over barriers to escape, while another executive had his shirt and jacket torn. The consequences of this demonstration are terrible since 7 people have been hurt whose 5 members of the management and a watchman. These events have provoked many reactions. The government has condemned theses actions by explaining that they were unacceptable. The secretary general of the labor force has deplored the violence even if he said that he understand the employees’ exasperation. Theses violence scenes are pretty shocking and reflect the climate of tension in Air France. As a conclusion, we can say that Air France employees are hungry and desperate to idea of loosing their jobs. They have already made so many sacrifices to restore Air France growth but the situation goes always so badly. They are tired of these constant workforce reductions and that led some of them to become violent. If I had to give my own opinion, I would say that I could understand that employees are revolting against the executives however, that does not explain violence. Conflict cannot be resolved through violence. Human resources executives are not at fault, they are just doing their jobs and try to redress the situation.

AIR FRANCE conflict Hello everyone ! Can you correct this for me please ? This document is an article entitled Air France: after an agitated day, the direction claims to be ready to resume the negotiations. It was taken from a french newspaper « le monde » published on october 5th 2015. This text focuses on the la crise chez AF et plus précisément sur la colère des employés d’AF suite à l’annonce de milliers de suppressions de poste. So the question is Comment expliquer la colère des employés d’Air France ? To begin with I will explain the reasons of the conflict in Air France In recent years, Air France is confronted with a rather significant reduction in its growth. It makes less and less profits because of the increase of the competition and especially the low-cost.To be more competitive, Air France want to set up an alternative plan named « perform ». The measures are pretty drastic since it lead to o the abolition of thousands posts. To be more precise, 300 airline pilots, 900 stewards and stewardess and finally 700 ground staff if not more would lose their jobs. So the situation is noticeably more and more strained What is worst is all of this is that trade unions and Air force cannot reach an agreement. Indeed, AF want his employees to work more without being paid more but employees refuse. The situation is critical, going from bad to worse. SInce the arrival of the new CEO 2011, almost 15000 people have lost their job.

Air France conflict This document is an article entitled Air France: after an agitated day, the direction claims to be ready to resume the negotiations. It was taken from a french newspaper « le monde » published on october 5th 2015. This text focuses on the la crise chez AF et plus précisément sur la colère des employés d’AF suite à l’annonce de milliers de suppressions de poste. So the question is Comment expliquer la colère des employés d’Air France ? To begin with I will explain the reasons of the conflict in Air France In recent years, Air France is confronted with a rather significant reduction in its growth. It makes less and less profits because of the increase of the competition and especially the low-cost.To be more competitive, Air France want to set up an alternative plan named « perform ». The measures are pretty drastic since it lead to o the abolition of thousands posts. To be more precise, 300 airline pilots, 900 stewards and stewardess and finally 700 ground staff if not more would lose their jobs. So the situation is noticeably more and more strained What is worst is all of this is that trade unions and Air force cannot reach an agreement. Indeed, AF want his employees to work more without being paid more but employees refuse. The situation is critical, going from bad to worse. SInce the arrival of the new CEO 2011, almost 15000 people have lost their job.

MACRON BILL This document is an article entitled “Macron Law: Green Light in The work on Sunday”. It was taken from a French Newspaper “Le Figaro” published on February 2nd 2015. The text focuses on the Macron law. It puts forward working on Sundays and the various repercussions that the implementation of this law will lead on the daily lives of the French people. Perhaps, this law will be a great stride in French working lives. So the question is: What are the consequences of the Macron Law on French society? To begin with, I will explain what does the Macron law consist in? Then I will talk about the positive effects and negative effects of this law. I. So, what does the bill consist in? As its name suggests, the French Minister for the Economy, Emmanuel Macron, has proposed Macron law. This article deals with one of the most controversial measures of this law, which is working on Sunday. This reform has 3 mains goals: expansion, activity and equality of economic opportunities. To achieve theses goals, several measures have been set up. First, countries will be able to open stores during 12 Sundays a year with the agreement of the mayor. Then, to develop tourism, International touristic zone will be created. Stores could be open during 52 Sundays a year and stayed open until midnight. This law also applies to the stores in the 12 most important stations in France. In the future, the Minister of Economy would like to open more stations on Sunday such as motorway stations or ferry terminals. So this law, which is pretty revolutionary, has a specific purpose: stimulating French economy.

Economic Law This document is an article entitled “Macron Law: Green Light in The work on Sunday”. It was taken from a French Newspaper “Le Figaro” published on February 2nd 2015. The text focuses on the Macron law. It puts forward working on Sundays and the various repercussions that the implementation of this law will lead on the daily lives of the French people. Perhaps, this law will be a great stride in French working lives. So the question is: What are the consequences of the Macron Law on French society? To begin with, I will explain what does the Macron law consist in? Then I will talk about the positive effects and negative effects of this law. I. So, what does the bill consist in? As its name suggests, the French Minister for the Economy, Emmanuel Macron, has proposed Macron law. This article deals with one of the most controversial measures of this law, which is working on Sunday. This reform has 3 mains goals: expansion, activity and equality of economic opportunities. To achieve theses goals, several measures have been set up. First, countries will be able to open stores during 12 Sundays a year with the agreement of the mayor. Then, to develop tourism, International touristic zone will be created. Stores could be open during 52 Sundays a year and stayed open until midnight. This law also applies to the stores in the 12 most important stations in France. In the future, the Minister of Economy would like to open more stations on Sunday such as motorway stations or ferry terminals. So this law, which is pretty revolutionary, has a specific purpose: stimulating French economy.