Anyone who can help to Learn Austrian German.

Ich Mochte Tee und milch mit honig. :-)

IELTS-Task-2 (feel free to give feedback) In contemporary society, everyone should have equal opportunities in education. Therefore, universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Education is essential for everyone in today’s world, and it actually impacts the whole society. Whether a university should allow the same number of students both male and female is a controversial issue because in my opinion individuals should get admitted according to their merit. If you take a look in the real world, most of the universities accept students only by admission test. For example, if you want to get admitted into the University of Dhaka then you must have to prove that you are meritorious enough student among all other competitors. In this way, based on merit lists, it should be considered the most effective way of selecting who are truly eligible to get admitted into a university. In contrast, if university only selected fixed number of students from both genders then it would be injustice to meritorious students. Every student has their own preference from which to choose a particular subject. Every person or student is different from each other so is their choice or preference. A student who wants to be an engineer is different from a student who wants to be a doctor because their preferences are different; moreover, if a student is allowed to study his/her preferable subject then he/she will professionally be more successful. Otherwise, they will become demotivated to continue their studies. To conclude, a university should not be based on accepting an equal number of students for admission. There are other things to be considered which would be a more justified or effective way of admitting students to universities.

IELTS-Task-2 (opinion) Some people think that the government is wasting money on arts and this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view? The government’s role is very wide when it comes to public spending; It has a lot of responsibility to spend money wisely for the betterment of its citizens. So, spending on arts is a waste as it does not directly affect the well being of ordinary citizens, whereas spending money on public healthcare and education can directly improve the lives of ordinary people, and in this essay, I will support my view with examples. One of the most significant public sectors, where government can allocate more money, is healthcare. Most of the people nowadays suffering from many diseases, and they do not get much needed proper medical treatment because of lack of hospitals; as a result, people are dying. If this sector gets more funds from authorities then it would be possible to build more hospitals, and this will improve the livelihood of people. Education is another most important thing for human beings, which can lead them to enrich individuals quality of life. Education helps to build people’s cognitive skills as well as they will succeed towards their professional life so in that case the government should spend more money on education; Furthermore, road and highways or building infrastructure would be better option for public spending, and these kind of investment will improve the wealth of a nation. To conclude, it is far better for a government to invest money in the above fields like education, healthcare and infrastructure rather than spending on the arts as it would benefit a country and its people more.

Correct or Incorrect! "To help you win over this tough crowd, will share a strategy." is this sentence correct grammatically?

IELTS Academic writing task 1:need correction In the year of 1990 and 2010, the amount of electricity created from five different sources of fuel in France, and the pie charts above capture this information. Overall, in 1990 natural gas and coal were the highest electricity producing fuels than any other source whereas hydro power was the least producing fuel. Now, when it comes to the year 2010 nuclear power has replaced both natural gas and coal for top producing fuel, and hydro power has remained the same as bottom position. In between 1990 and 2010 coal as a source of electricity producing fuel fell by just under the half; similarly, oil electric production declined by 22% to 13%, a 11% dip. At the same period of time another noticeable thing was the electric produced from natural gas went down by almost a quarter. The hydro power really didn’t move as we can see a slight fall from 6% to 2% a small proportion of amount over the two decades; however, during this period another interesting thing was electric produced of nuclear power dramatically tripled from 1990 to 2010.

Parallel Structure or Not ? "Heated to a comfortable temperature, guests and members can enjoy leisure swimming all around the year." Is this sentence Parallel?

First attempt to write something about IELTS Academic Writing Task 1. The given pie chats illustrate the proportion of five types of energy production in the France in 1995 and 2005. Overall, in the 1995 coal was the highest power source production than any other items, yet nuclear and other source were the minimal. Now, when it comes to 2005 gas has taken on the top position, and other source has remained the least producing choice. From 1995 to 2005, coal energy source production increased by a tiny proportion of 1.13%; similarly, gas rose by .68% (an insignificant proportion).The petro move as we can see declined from 29.27% to 19.55%, a 9.72% dip. Nuclear power source production increased by 3.50% from 1995 to 2005; likewise, producing of other source rose by a small portion of 4.2%.