The description for statistic diagram. The three diagrams provide some information about coffee around the world. The first pie chart illustrates the distribution of coffee production. The major amount of coffee produced by South Africa, representing 42% of total production, at least twice higher than the rest of countries in this chart. The percentages occupied by Indonesia Japan and Vietnam of production are similar, making up 21% 19% and 18% respectively. The second pie chart shows the information of coffee consumption. European are really fond of coffee, constituting 50% of total market. The second largest customer is America, 30% of coffee is consumed by them. In contrast, Japan only represents 8% of total consumption, far lower than above two regions. The third chart provide the proportion of profits. Incredibly, a half of profit go into the pocket of delivery, twice higher than the proportion of retailers (25%). However, compared with them, the proportion of profit belonging to producer is extremely small, only 10%. In summary, some countries are large producers of coffee, but they do not consume much coffee. The large consumption appears in some countries who have long history of coffee.

Yound or elderly , which is more compentent for leaders. My writing: It is common that most leaders are the elderly. However, while young people have some unique characters, so I approve they can also be a leader in teams. Compared with the elderly, young people exactly have some deficiency to be a leader. Their work time is shorter and experience less frustrations and crisis than old people. So, their experience is not as abundant as old people. This point is important for those subordinates. They are more willing to trust a person who had handled similar events many times rather than a novice. Therefore, it might be more difficult for young people to lead an organization to operate stably. However, young people possess some advantages that old people do not have or have lost. They are more adventurous and innovative in making decision for teams. As a result, they can perceive the potential neglected by seniors and dare to make the attempts that seniors will not access easily. Sometimes, these audacious thoughts generate incredible success and leave a deep impression to those old people. Furthermore, young people are more energetic and passionate. These features can influence the work pace of whole team. When their subordinates notice their leader work actively, they will submerge into work subliminally. Consequently, young people are more appropriate for the team which need more vitality or drastic reforms. In conclusion, I think young people can be a leader as old people. But they are adaptable for different organizations. Old leaders are adept at avoiding risk and operate team stably, while young leaders can bring vigor and unpredictable change to a team.

What age is proper for children to attend school? Sending children to school at the appropriate age is essential for their future growth. But different children have different situation including git, family context and experience. So, we should consider those factors comprehensively before we send them to school. Some people believe that school provide better education to children, so they send their children to school as soon as possible. Certainly, the teachers of school have been trained and qualified by specific institutions, so they possess professional knowledge and skill about guiding children to study in a correct way. Hence, compared with ordinary parents, children are able to learn more effectively and quickly under the guidance of teachers. Besides, children have the opportunities to get along with peers and acquire some social skills which is impossible to learn at home. This initial interaction among children can establish some foundation for their future interpersonal network which is more complex and thornier. Therefore, the advantages of early school are obvious. However, some opponents think seven years old is an optimal age for children to attend school. It is adverse for them to be sent to school before that age. Some children have not possessed the ability of living in an environment without the accompany of parents before 7 years old. Like the kangaroo babies, they have not prepared fully to jump out the pockets of mothers. If we drag them out violently, they may not develop well in after time. For unprepared children, they will feel panic and dread in an entirely strange context, which may leave some metal shadow to them. Considering this point, choosing a proper time to send children to school is significant for their mental health. From my perspective, the time when children attend school should fit into their individual situation of growth. Some children have relatively mature mind, so they can adapt to school environment easily. While some children have not grown to the stage when they can jump out the protection of parents, it is better for them to delay the time to school. In a word, wo should assess the ability and conditions of children carefully rather than set a specific age easily or send them to school as early as possible

Should we discriminate genius from ordinary children？ My writing： The emergence of genius always draws the particular attention, and human tend to allocate better resource to them, hoping they can grow better. But I think the resources or surroundings regarded as the best by us may be not definitely appropriate for them. Collective study allows students to learn something that they cannot acquire when they study alone. Even for the talents, they can learn some social skills during the period of getting along with peers. While, conventional concept usually describe that the genius is solitary person. I suppose these words should be applied in their learning rather their whole life. Besides ordinary students can learn some unique learning skills from genius, which conduce them to making bigger academic progress. Therefore, the mixture of genius and ordinary people will benefit bilaterally. However, some opponents insist that it is a waste of their talent if we put them into a common environment. Admittedly, the learning capacity of genius is superior to peers, and they may feel miserable or helpless when they live in a place where their peers and teachers are not able to understand their advanced thought. Therefore, if they grow in a barren soil, their talent will miss the golden period of development. It is really regretful loss for them and human beings. From my perspective, the learning mode should respect the will of genius and be applicable for their situation. We actually provide better academic context for them, meanwhile, we should not deprive them of the opportunities of communicating and making friend with peers. Because genius can learn some extracurricular things from ordinary students. In a word, we should offer especially academic treatment, at the same time, we should give them entire life which include the things out of study.

Some opinion about those junior trainees for Olympic Game My writing: Under the financial support of countries, some children are trained to be professional athletes from a young age. Personally, I disapprove of this early training, given the detrimental effect of it on the growth of children. Those international large games are an appropriate stage for various countries show their muscle of technologies and improve fame on the world. Some critics once said Olympic Game is a battle field without powder. Therefore, most countries invest massive fund to seek gifted children and cultivate them as early as possible, so they can win medals on international tournaments. Once they stand on podium, the national flag of their countries will be rose. With the fame earned in games, countries may have more international cooperation and certain weight of speech on international conferences. However, the process of training cause abnormal development to children. The shape of their limbs may become deformed as a result of the excessive exercises. And when they retire, they are probably afflicted by the sequela of injury got in competition. Furthermore, being the athletes who have the qualification of participate in Olympic Game need to push their body to limit again and again during the training, which is a dangerous and painful thing for normal people. Therefore, if those children knew the miserable process and irrevocable abnormal of body, would they still choose this way? From my perspective, it is unacceptable that children are trained before they grow to mature state. Before their body can take those intense exercise and their mind can realize the risk and pain of this process, we should not compel them to exercise. Moreover, the purpose of sports is to improve physical quality and the purpose of Olympic Game is to prevent war. Nowadays, medals and fame become the sole target of sport, and game is a new battel field. So , I completely oppose that countries encourage children to attend training.

Is it good for us to change job frequently？ My writing: The frequency of changing job is higher than before. It is necessary to discuss the reasons of this phenomenon so that we can fully prepare for the uncertainty of job prospect. The first probable cause is that the free share of educational resources provides employees with opportunities to improve their work skills and knowledge so that they can change some better positions of employment. Extensive and free courses of leading universities are accessible on websites. Employees can watch those prerecorded courses to grasp the latest technologies or be well-informed about the development trend of a certain industry. With these advanced skills, they can easily change to a better job. The other possible reason is that thriving economy and progressive technologies stimulate the emergency of new industries and collaborations such as drone, the fifth generation of communication and electronic commerce. Besides, more people try to set up own business in this prosperous context. Therefore, there are more positions for employees to select. In order to fit into this trend, employees should pay attention to two aspects. The first issue is that they need to upgrade their skill set and technological knowledge constantly, which ensure they can satisfy the latest requirement of employment. They can fully utilize those free educational resources to promote themselves. Or they can even divide a part of their income into learning new skills. The other aspect is to hold certain amount of savings. They can learn some tips of financial management and make elaborate budget for themselves. As a result, when they are unemployed, they can safely get through this tough period.

What age is proper for children to attend school? Sending children to school at the appropriate age is essential for their future growth. But different children have different situation including git, family context and experience. So, we should consider those factors comprehensively before we send them to school. Some people believe that school provide better education to children, so they send their children to school as soon as possible. Certainly, the teachers of school have been trained and qualified by specific institutions, so they possess professional knowledge and skill about guiding children to study in a correct way. Hence, compared with ordinary parents, children are able to learn more effectively and quickly under the guidance of teachers. Besides, children have the opportunities to get along with peers and acquire some social skills which is impossible to learn at home. This initial interaction among children can establish some foundation for their future interpersonal network which is more complex and thornier. Therefore, the advantages of early school are obvious. However, some opponents think seven years old is an optimal age for children to attend school. It is adverse for them to be sent to school before that age. Some children have not possessed the ability of living in an environment without the accompany of parents before 7 years old. Like the kangaroo babies, they have not prepared fully to jump out the pockets of mothers. If we drag them out violently, they may not develop well in after time. For unprepared children, they will feel panic and dread in an entirely strange context, which may leave some metal shadow to them. Considering this point, choosing a proper time to send children to school is significant for their mental health. From my perspective, the time when children attend school should fit into their individual situation of growth. Some children have relatively mature mind, so they can adapt to school environment easily. While some children have not grown to the stage when they can jump out the protection of parents, it is better for them to delay the time to school. In a word, wo should assess the ability and conditions of children carefully rather than set a specific age easily or send them to school as early as possible

I described a diagram. This diagram illustrates the different distribution of postgraduates and undergraduates in terms of their reason of choosing Paler University. Reputation and cost were the major reasons that students chose Paler university. 42% of postgraduates were out of its reputation, higher than the figure of undergraduates (35%). Similarly, the postgraduates who chose this university because of reasonable cost represented 32%, slightly higher than the proportion of undergraduates (24%). The largest difference between two groups of students appeared in personal recommendation. The proportion of undergraduates hearing of this university from others was 18%, three times than the proportion of postgraduate (6%). While, the distribution of students who selected this university out of other reasons were around even in undergraduates and postgraduates. 6% of postgraduates and 8% of undergraduates liked the location of Paler university, so they chose it. And there are 8% postgraduates and 7% undergraduates entering this university because they were satisfied with the accommodation. In summary, most students were attracted by the reputation of Paler University. And undergraduates were more willing to listen to others’ recommendation than postgraduate.

Some opinion about those junior trainees for Olympic Game My writing: Under the financial support of countries, some children are trained to be professional athletes from a young age. Personally, I disapprove of this early training, given the detrimental effect of it on the growth of children. Those international large games are an appropriate stage for various countries show their muscle of technologies and improve fame on the world. Some critics once said Olympic Game is a battle field without powder. Therefore, most countries invest massive fund to seek gifted children and cultivate them as early as possible, so they can win medals on international tournaments. Once they stand on podium, the national flag of their countries will be rose. With the fame earned in games, countries may have more international cooperation and certain weight of speech on international conferences. However, the process of training cause abnormal development to children. The shape of their limbs may become deformed as a result of the excessive exercises. And when they retire, they are probably afflicted by the sequela of injury got in competition. Furthermore, being the athletes who have the qualification of participate in Olympic Game need to push their body to limit again and again during the training, which is a dangerous and painful thing for normal people. Therefore, if those children knew the miserable process and irrevocable abnormal of body, would they still choose this way? From my perspective, it is unacceptable that children are trained before they grow to mature state. Before their body can take those intense exercise and their mind can realize the risk and pain of this process, we should not compel them to exercise. Moreover, the purpose of sports is to improve physical quality and the purpose of Olympic Game is to prevent war. Nowadays, medals and fame become the sole target of sport, and game is a new battel field. So , I completely oppose that countries encourage children to attend training.