Can someone please revise my summary? Thanks

A public policy researcher suggested that alcohol company companies pay the movie (producer) for the appearance. For From the research (or "The research reveals"), there’s over 92% chance the audience can see the alcohol images in the movie. Even though it’s a family type of movie, there’s nearly 50% of film containing alcohol images. In the 1998 settlement, the largest tobacco companies agreed that they’re not going to fund the products in the movie. After that, the percentage of the depiction of smoking and tobacco brands dropped by 50% in movies. Sargent says that if alcohol companies could obey the same rule, there would be a significant drop of in alcohol images in movies.

According to the surveys in the US, students who have watched the films containing alcohol are more likely to consume alcohol products. If the survey were done in Europe, it would be much higher since most of the movies in Europe contain alcohol use.
According to the research by Russel, a marketing professor, he thinks that companies know that they can avoid the regulation easily if they show images in the movie. He had a research showing His research reveals that teenagers have a tendency to have a good impression of alcohol if there’s a storyline suggesting that drinking can lead to some benefits. Therefore, the professor thinks that alcohol depiction in movies is considered a problem in nowadays today's society. He suggests that teenagers should be educated in the subliminal messaging so they can be more aware of that it (1).  He hopes that movie industry can focus more on the influence of alcohol so that parents can keep track of their kids.

(1) He suggests that teenagers should be educated in subliminal messaging do they can be more aware of their effects.

Well done Chiao, you have done a great job of this!

Cheers

Jacqueline