Search from various ภาษาอังกฤษ teachers...
italki378720
Hi
Can you help me?
I have a question. Which one is correct or more natural?
1. I had a spell at ABC Company for 3 years ago.
2. I worked at ABC Company for 3 years ago.
Thanks in advance
22 เม.ย. 2022 เวลา 7:58
คำตอบ · 7
The comment below is incorrect. You can, "Work there for a spell," but usage of this might be regional. As an Australian English speaker, I would understand it, and I would suppose native UK speakers would to. But that doesn't mean it's the best option.
Neither sentence really strikes me as particularly natural. For example, you can say:
I had/worked a spell at ABC three years ago.
I worked at ABC until three years ago (or just I worked at ABC three years ago).
I would probably go with one of those last two. Using "for" is incorrect.
If you opt for 'spell', I'd suggest using this in less formal contexts and for more throwaway conversation. "Oh, I worked there for a spell too a couple of years back." It's not as great a response to an employer's questioning, however.
Hope this help.
22 เมษายน 2022
Using "a spell" to mean a period of time is correct but rather colloquial and 'folksy'. For most normal usage you're probably better off using no. 2. If you want to say for a period of time 'a while' is more standard.
23 เมษายน 2022
Number 2, definitely.
Spell means spelling words or a kind of magic. It has no meaning in such a context.
22 เมษายน 2022
ยังไม่พบคำตอบของคุณใช่ไหม
เขียนคำถามของคุณเพื่อให้เจ้าของภาษาช่วยคุณ!
italki378720
ทักษะด้านภาษา
ภาษาอังกฤษ, ไทย
ภาษาที่เรียน
ภาษาอังกฤษ
บทความที่คุณอาจชอบ

Same Word, Different Meaning: American, British, and South African English
9 ถูกใจ · 7 ความคิดเห็น

How to Sound Confident in English (Even When You’re Nervous)
12 ถูกใจ · 9 ความคิดเห็น

Marketing Vocabulary and Phrases for Business English Learners
7 ถูกใจ · 2 ความคิดเห็น
บทความเพิ่มเติม