Search from various ภาษาอังกฤษ teachers...
Lily
I haven't seen him in years. She said she hadn't seen him in years.
Is this correct, or do I need to change "in years" to something else? Thanks!
5 ธ.ค. 2014 เวลา 15:28
คำตอบ · 5
2
Both are fine. You could say, "I haven't seen him FOR years," as well.
If you want to go to the future... then you need 'for.' ('in' doesn't work). I won't/mightn't/shan't see him for years. However, word it differently and 'in' works: I'll see him in a few years.
But for the present and past: I haven't seen him in/for years, I hadn't seen him in/for years.
Also, I didn't see him for years. I think it sounds odd to use 'in' here. With 'didn't' - but perhaps that's just me!
5 ธันวาคม 2014
1
I'm guessing that you're asking about changing a sentence from direct to indirect speech. What you have written is correct. The phrase 'in years' doesn't change
when you put the sentence into indirect speech.
5 ธันวาคม 2014
1
Both are correct.
5 ธันวาคม 2014
ยังไม่พบคำตอบของคุณใช่ไหม
เขียนคำถามของคุณเพื่อให้เจ้าของภาษาช่วยคุณ!
Lily
ทักษะด้านภาษา
ภาษาอาหรับ, ภาษาอังกฤษ, ภาษาฝรั่งเศส
ภาษาที่เรียน
ภาษาอังกฤษ, ภาษาฝรั่งเศส
บทความที่คุณอาจชอบ

Same Word, Different Meaning: American, British, and South African English
18 ถูกใจ · 16 ความคิดเห็น

How to Sound Confident in English (Even When You’re Nervous)
15 ถูกใจ · 12 ความคิดเห็น

Marketing Vocabulary and Phrases for Business English Learners
13 ถูกใจ · 6 ความคิดเห็น
บทความเพิ่มเติม
