Search from various ภาษาอังกฤษ teachers...
[บัญชีผู้ใช้ที่ปิดการใช้งานแล้ว]
Why is the indicative mood rather than subjuctive mood? (detailed topic inside)
Why did the conditional clause use subjunctive mood, while the main clause used indicative mood (i.e. past simple) rather than subjuctive mood (e.g. would do or be)?
-
If it were gentle, only the more unstable rods fell. If it were severe, they all fell.
3 ต.ค. 2016 เวลา 4:02
คำตอบ · 6
1
I'm not sure there's much to explain here except that the writer made a mistake. The correct sentence would use your alternative:
If it were gentle, only the more unstable rods would fall. If it were severe, they would all fall.
Another possibility would be a mixed conditional, which mixes a present condition with a hypothetical past result:
If it were gentle, only the more unstable rods would have fallen. If it were severe, they would all have fallen
(actually, I'm not even sure what this sentence even means...I'm assuming “it" refers to wind, that's the only "it" word I can think of that collocates with "gentle" and “severe”.)
3 ตุลาคม 2016
ยังไม่พบคำตอบของคุณใช่ไหม
เขียนคำถามของคุณเพื่อให้เจ้าของภาษาช่วยคุณ!
บทความที่คุณอาจชอบ

Santa, St. Nicholas, or Father Christmas? How Christmas Varies Across English-Speaking Countries
3 ถูกใจ · 0 ความคิดเห็น

Reflecting on Your Progress: Year-End Language Journal Prompts
2 ถูกใจ · 1 ความคิดเห็น

Same Word, Different Meaning: American, British, and South African English
25 ถูกใจ · 17 ความคิดเห็น
บทความเพิ่มเติม
