Could you please correct my essay? Now with spaces between paragraphs. ;) Thank you in advance Some people say that the best way to improve health by increasin the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measure are required. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. At present, public health is a very serious issue that has become in one of the priority of society and governments in general. Thus, some people say that the best way to improve health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. However, others are of the opinion that this would not have significant effects on public health and that other measure are required. This essay will discuss both points of view and I will give my own opinion on this matter at the end. Advocates of the idea that sports facilities must be increased to improve health, might argue important reasons to support this. For example, has been demonstrated that to do exercise with regularly has physical, psychological and social benefits in humans. For example, it helps to prevent cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and control overweight as well, which are major worries among the population. Furthermore, it is important to highlight that when we do exercise liberate good hormones such as endorphins and serotonin, that make us feel better. In addition, it is well known that sports is a good way to disconnect from our routine lives. Consequently, it is necessary to increase the sport facilities in order to improve the public health. Firstly, the prices of sports centers and gyms might be cheaper and affordable for everyone. And secondly, government should invest more money in to building more bike lanes and sports infrastructures. On the other hand, the opponents to this idea argue that increasing sports facilities would have little effects on health and other measures are required. I think they are in part right, because it is well known that do exercise without following a healthy lifestyle is not worthwhile. Therefore, in order to increase the public health government could promote healthy habits such as, eating healthy, quit to smoke or don't abuse of alcohol, for example. In fact, some countries are already promoting these good habits among society. In my opinion, I totally agree that the best way to improve the public health is by increasing the sports facilities. However, I think that healthy habits must be promoted besides the increase of sports facilities for the improvement of public health.

Could you please correct my essay? Thank you in advance Some people say that the best way to improve health by increasin the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measure are required. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. At present, public health is a very serious issue that has become in one of the priority of society and governments in general. Thus, some people say that the best way to improve health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. However, others are of the opinion that this would not have significant effects on public health and that other measure are required. This essay will discuss both points of view and I will give my own opinion on this matter at the end. Advocates of the idea that sports facilities must be increased to improve health, might argue important reasons to support this. For example, has been demonstrated that to do exercise with regularly has physical, psychological and social benefits in humans. For example, it helps to prevent cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and control overweight as well, which are major worries among the population. Furthermore, it is important to highlight that when we do exercise liberate good hormones such as endorphins and serotonin, that make us feel better. In addition, it is well known that sports is a good way to disconnect from our routine lives. Consequently, it is necessary to increase the sport facilities in order to improve the public health. Firstly, the prices of sports centers and gyms might be cheaper and affordable for everyone. And secondly, government should invest more money in to building more bike lanes and sports infrastructures. On the other hand, the opponents to this idea argue that increasing sports facilities would have little effects on health and other measures are required. I think they are in part right, because it is well known that do exercise without following a healthy lifestyle is not worthwhile. Therefore, in order to increase the public health government could promote healthy habits such as, eating healthy, quit to smoke or don't abuse of alcohol, for example. In fact, some countries are already promoting these good habits among society. In my opinion, I totally agree that the best way to improve the public health is by increasing the sports facilities. However, I think that healthy habits must be promoted besides the increase of sports facilities for the improvement of public health.

Could you please correct my essay? Thank you in advance Some experts believe that is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this otuweigh the disadvantages? Nowadays, learning a foreign language has become a basic tool for everyone in this globalized world. Consequently, some experts are of the opinion that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school instead of at secondary school. I agree with this statement, but I believe that there are some drawbacks and shortcomings in this topic though. This essay will give reasons to support this argument. To begin, it is demonstrated that kids learn faster and easily when they are young. Thus, learning English at primary school is, without doubt, more convenient than at secondary school. They are able to get familiar with a foreign language sooner and develop the necessary skills for this. For example, some elementary schools teach English to kids from 4 to 6 years old through games, songs or fun activities. These experiences are a good way to have a first contact with a foreign language and the kids will feel more comfortable with it when they go to the secondary school. On the other hand, some people think that to study a foreign language at secondary school has more disadvantages than advantages. First of all, the students have more subjects, more tasks, more homework and less time to focus on a foreign language. A case in point, is that a considerable percentage of pupils need to attend extracurricular English classes as a result of a higher workload. Secondly, some secondary students complain about the repetition in the topics from grade to grade. Personally, I completely agree with this because I had this problem when I was in the secondary school. I could notice that the topics are mostly the same year to year. Therefore, the pupils don’t improve in English and ,furthermore, they get tired and frustrated. Consequently, some of them might quit learning a foreign language in their adult life as a consequence of a bad organisation on topics. In conclusion, I strongly believe that students should begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than at secondary school, whenever, it has been organized by a properly program that varies from grade to grade

Could you please correct my analysis? Thank you in advance. The bar charts show information about the rainfall, temperature, the average in hours of sunshine and the average in numbers of days with thunder in the cities of Brasilia and Recife. It can be seen from the chart that the wettest months in Brazil are November, December and January, in which 21 or 24 days it is raining. Whereas in Recife the wettest months are from April to June in which the amount of raining days is almost the same than in Brasilia. The driest season in Brasilia correspond to the month of July and August, with only 2 or 3 days of rain. On the contrary, in Recife there are more wet days, even in the driest season, that goes from October to December in which there are 10 or 11 wet days. According to the data, in Recife the temperatures are more stable and bearable than Brasilia, where the temperature is more extreme and it could fluctuate sharply from a maximum of 32ºC to a minimum of 0ºC in a same day. In Brasilia 6 out of 12 months there are more than 10 days per month with thunders. In contrast, the average in numbers of days with thunders in Recife is almost insignificant, with only 0 to 3 days per month. Overall, the weather in Brasilia is not as stable as Recife. Instead of that, the weather in Brasilia is fluctuating and varying.

What does mean this expression 'top-down approach' in this sentence? Thank you in advance. This is the sentence, To attack these difficulties, researchers tried to use the 'top-down approach' using a computer in an attempt to program all the essential rules onto a single disc.

Cómo se dice en Inglés, ¿remangar los pantalones / o las mangas de la camiseta? Quiero saber cómo escribir en Inglés remangar los pantalones o las mangas de la camisa. Gracias

I love walking barefoot in the sand on the beach. I love walking barefoot in the sand on the beach, it's the first thing I do when I go to the beach. I take off my shoes, socks, I wake up my pants. Then I go to the shore and sink my feet in the sand and then start taking long steps. It's like a ritual because I always do the same. I also like walking on the beach and when I'm tired I sit somewhere on the beach and I contemplate the sea. Another thing I like to do when I go to the beach is lie in the sand without a towel and cover myself with sand, then I rub my body to remove the dead skin (I love do it) When I look like a croquette I run to the sea and bathe to remove all the sand. The skin is very soft after do that.. I can't do all that very often because I live far from the sea. We don't need to much to enjoy. I consider myself a happy person by nature, I know appreciate and enjoy the small pleasures of life.

HUGS ARE A THERAPY If you ask someone what is a hug, they could reply that it is a way to show affection, care and love to the person receiving the hug. The Research Institute of the University of Miami School of Medicine, United States has conducted more than 100 studies about the effects of contact in the health recovery. According to their results, the hugs caress and touch have a highly positive effect on health. When we give a hug the brain release those hormones, oxytocin, (called the love hormone) serotonin and dopamine. Thanks to these hormones we feel wellbeing, harmony and fullness.Due to the high health benefits, currently the hugs have being used as an alternative therapy to combat some diseases. Dr. David Spiegel of Stanford University, California, USA is a pioneer in observing the correlation between longevity and group therapeutic support in women with metastatic breast cancer. According to his research, the hugs improve the quality of life and reduces pain in many patients So after knowing the benefits of giving a hug, it's time for us to reflect, have more contacts with others and give more hugs every day.

¿Cómo se dice en inglés estar de baja laboral y tambien que te den el alta médica? Gracias