ค้นหาจากครู ภาษาอังกฤษ หลากหลายคน...
โพสต์
Final essay part 2
Voluntary military system can decrease waste of resource and money. Under conscription, there are two reasons why it wastes budget. First, too much personal resources are conscripted into army. Most of the soldiers conscripted into army are men aged between 20 and 22. If they work in society, a drastic social benefit would be made. In other words, a drastic social benefit disappeared because of conscription. Second, conscription makes excessive budget for army. For example, current army spends money on public service worker because they have too much personal resource. Under voluntary military service, army budget will be used for soldiers only. These two things shows that voluntary army system decrease waste of resource and money.
Voluntary military system makes better soldiers. There are two reasons why it is true. First, they are voluntarily applied soldiers. It is obvious that a man who wanted to be a soldier will be better a soldier than a man who doesn’t. Some would argue that there is no evidence that conscripted soldiers has lower morale. However, the case of the Iraq Civil War tells the naked truth of the conscription. They had much more soldiers than ISIL, but one-fourth of conscripted army ran away as the war occurred. This means when a war begins, 150,000 soldiers of Korean army can desert. Second, soldiers under voluntary military service system are trained longer than current system’s soldiers. In sum, voluntary military system makes stronger soldiers because longer training and desire to be a soldier will make them upright.
In conclusion, it is better to change conscription to voluntary army system for the following reasons: less barbaric, less waste of resource and money, stronger morale. As voluntary military system goes on, violence caused by conscription’s compulsiveness will be gone. Money for public service worker paid by army will be gone and personal resource that does not draft by army will make social benefits. Thus waste of army bill will be decrease. In addition, soldiers will have their own credo to be a soldier and have trained more. It’s obvious that these soldiers will be braver and stronger. See how voluntary military service would make army and society better. Face up the reality. It’s time to realize the absurdity of conscription.
0
0
Final essay part 1
The Failure of Conscription
“Every Korean serves duty of national defense.” (Chapter II article 39 of Constitution of the Republic of Korea) This seems right. However, this law has been justified the imprisonment of Korean men in army for 2 years. Every year, over 90% of Korean men have to serve this duty for 2 years. ("Result of an Examination for Conscription." Https://www.data.go.kr/. Military Manpower Administration, 2014. Web. 8 June 2015.) Because of its compulsiveness, compulsive military service made problems such as violence, waste of resource and money, lower morale. To stop these, changing current army system to voluntary army system is necessary. Its ‘compulsiveness’ makes young soldiers violent, wastes resource and money, makes demoralized soldiers. There are 3 reasons why we have to change current one to voluntary military service: less violence, less waste of resources, better soldiers.
If a person has to be imprisoned for 2 years just because he is male, what will he feel? He will never be happy with the situation. Moreover, he’ll become aggressive. Philip George Zimbardo says “When people are imprisoned in certain place compulsively, they get stressed and act aggressively.” (Philip George Zimbardo, (2007). The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil. New York: Random House. Page 48) In other words, once compulsive army system is exterminated, soldiers will not think they are imprisoned. Furthermore, they will not abuse privates. Just by changing into voluntary military service, the number of violence problem will become less. Therefore, changing conscription to voluntary military service is necessary.
1
0
Academic Writing - 1
Danger of Being Too Honest
Being honest is usually regarded as a good thing. However, being too honest is not a good thing; rather, it should be regarded as a dangerous thing for three reasons. First of all, it damages relationships. If an ugly person is dressed up and asks honest people how he or she looks today, honest people will say “You look ugly today”. This will hurt the ugly person’s heart because it is not what they wanted. By this way, being too honest damages relationships. Secondly, being too honest is not good for children’s growing up. There are things that children learn as they grow up and things that they should learn after they become a grown-up. For instance, if foster parents tell their grown-up children that they are adopted, their children will not think it as a bad thing; rather, they will thank their foster parents. In contrast, if foster parents tell their children in adolescence that they are adopted, their children will not take it properly; rather, they will wander. Finally, being too honest is bad for patients because it makes the Placebo Effect disappeared. The Placebo Effect is an effective way to cure various diseases by patients’ belief that they are taking proper medicine. However, if doctors are too honest, patients know that it’s a fake medicine; in other words, this effect does not happen. Consequently, being too honest damages relationships, and is harmful to children’s growing up and bad for patients.
5
0
Today
Today is the first day in here, this site.
Since i stopped writing something by using English, (more than 3 years) it feels quite weird.
It's 5:06 am, here, and i have to go to school after two and a half hours later. Sleep, study, friend. These are things which i can't choose all, but only two. And today i give up sleeping. Eww
Fatigue comes slowly but steadily. It's gonna be a tough day again.
~Korea~
2
0
