Is this letter grammatically correct? Dear Editor My and my colleagues’ paper titled XXXX was in the “major revision” status. My colleagues and I have worked hard during this time to address all the issues raised by the honorable referees, but to my surprise, when I intended to upload the revised paper today, I came across a message that said the editor had withdrawn the paper. Please explain what has happened. Why has my paper withdrawn? My colleagues and I have worked too hard and resolved all the errors. We do not understand this. Please provide the conditions for the continuation of refereeing as our paper would have been accepted after revision. Thanks a lot in advance

Which one is correct? 1) The translation is a historical activity whose roots can be found in ancient times. 2) The translation is a historical activity whose roots go far back in history. Or should I write it in another way? Thanks a million in advance

Accounting What do the following phrases or expressions mean? 1) Due from related parties 2) Due to related parties 3) Provision for end of service benefits Thanks a million in advance

An academic text In Table 4, the best hydrological and optimal SSQ variables for the new 4P-NVPMLMM model as well as two four- and five-parameter models are compared. The optimal SSQ value is calculated to be 9453.2 using the first model, while in the five-parameter model, where the parameter m is modified with five flow levels, the optimal SSQ value is obtained 31394.99. The variable parameter method has reduced the objective function value by 70%. For the 4P-NVPMLMM model, the corresponding hydrological parameters are K = … and m = ... and the corresponding dimensionless parameters are r1 = ... and r2 = ... As shown in this figure, the routed outflows very well fit the observed outflow hydrograph using the new 4P-NVPMLMM method and the PSO-GA algorithm. According to Table 5, for all four examples, the values of SAD, ETP, and MARE are decreased in the new 4P_NVPMLMM method compared to the other methods. Furthermore, the VarexQ value is increased in the new 4P-NVPMLMM method in comparison with the other methods. In Wilson (1974), River Wye, and Viessman and Lewis (2003), the ETP value is reduced; however, in the Karoon River, this value is higher than the other two methods. Finally, it has been concluded that for all four examples, the value of the objective function is reduced by the new 4P-NVPMLMM method. This model can be applied to the problems that require more precision.

Is this text correct in terms of grammar, punctuation, writing style, etc.? In Table 4, the best hydrological and optimal SSQ variables for the new 4P-NVPMLMM model as well as two four- and five-parameter models are compared. The optimal SSQ value is calculated to be 9453.2 using the first model, while in the five-parameter model, where the parameter m is modified with five flow levels, the optimal SSQ value is obtained 31394.99. The variable parameter method has reduced the objective function value by 70%. For the 4P-NVPMLMM model, the corresponding hydrological parameters are K = … and m = ... and the corresponding dimensionless parameters are r1 = ... and r2 = ... As shown in this figure, the routed outflows very well fit the observed outflow hydrograph using the new 4P-NVPMLMM method and the PSO-GA algorithm. According to Table 5, for all four examples, the values of SAD, ETP, and MARE are decreased in the new 4P_NVPMLMM method compared to the other methods. Furthermore, the VarexQ value is increased in the new 4P-NVPMLMM method in comparison with the other methods. In Wilson (1974), River Wye, and Viessman and Lewis (2003), the ETP value is reduced; however, in the Karoon River, this value is higher than the other two methods. Finally, it has been concluded that for all four examples, the value of the objective function is reduced by the new 4P-NVPMLMM method. This model can be applied to the problems that require more precision. Is this text correct in terms of grammar, punctuation, writing style, choosing appropriate phrases and expressions, etc.? Thanks a lot in advance

Would you please correct the following sentence? The individual rank, the average rank, and the final rank for the average efficiency of the five algorithms on unimodal and multimodal test functions were reported in Tables, respectively. Is there any redundant word or structure in this sentence? Thanks a million

to/for Bozorg-Haddad et al. (2016) studied the performance of the gravity search algorithm (GSA) for optimizing (to optimize) a single- and multi-reservoir system. Which one should I use? "for optimizing" or "to optimize"? Why? Thanks a million

Increasing demands/ an increased demand/ increased demands/ an increase in demand Increasing demands for using water resources in different parts such as agriculture, energy, industrial, and drinkable water has always been one of the challenges of the recent century. Which one should I use here? Why? Thanks a lot in advance

in/at the early iterations of. Which one? Additionally, it utilizes three adaptive parameters to increase population diversity in the early iterations of the optimization process and improve the convergence speed in the last iterations. The efficiency of ADEPSO is investigated on ten test functions, including unimodal and multimodal functions. Should I say "in the early/last iterations of" or "at the early/last iterations of"? Thanks a million