Minh Thu
I do not know whether it is correct or not Article 1. Opened Expert Team as the agency of the parent company (F.G.NOTION CO., LTD) to support the factory operation process in Vietnam started on 3/2015 (VIET NAM BYRON HOLDINGS LIMITED). The factory is tentatively set to start on 8/2015, including the members: Article 2. During the supporting period, Expert Team actively proposes the fieldwork plan in Vietnam. The tentative activity plan of Expert Team in Vietnam Article 3. Party B will be responsible to pay the costs incurred related to the expert team in Vietnam (living expenses and healthcare service) in the scope of work supports the implementation of the new factory In the case that the members of expert team perform a self-payment for service providers in Vietnam, Party B is obliged to reimburse these costs to Party A based on legal documents. Article 4. This agreement is valid from the date of establishment. Expert Team is automatically dissolved after completion of initial support for Party B and when factory officially go into operation.
16 Thg 09 2015 04:53
Bài chữa · 2
Hi there, I just want to know whether it correct in grammar or not :) By the way, are you studying Vietnamese ?
5 tháng 10 năm 2015
This looks like legalese which does not always adhere to the conventions of standard English. Other than a missing punctuation mark, I am not certain what this is trying to accomplish so I'm not sure how to respond to your question of whether it is right or not. What exactly are you asking about being right or not?
4 tháng 10 năm 2015
Bạn muốn tiến bộ xa hơn?
Hãy tham gia cộng đồng học tập này và thử nghiệm những bài tập miễn phí!